Vikings - Lucy Inglis

I began writing about history as a student of Anglo-Saxon. Our tutor was registered blind, so five of us sat around each week and discussed sea spray and the feel of heather, and leather tunics, and the morning-cold spear handles of dawn.

Since then I've gone on to eighteenth century history in all its tiny detail, imagining the feel of a begging bowl, a corset, a coin. But this week the Hollywood series for the television channel History, Vikings, has me back in the Dark Ages. I know! At first I thought, this is going to be rubbish. But it's not. It's entertaining and just...good. A bold attempt at depicting the eighth century? That takes time, money and research.

Too often, the people of the Dark Ages, and particularly the Vikings, are portrayed as little more than animals. The Vikings, who in reality were farmers who were running out of land in their own country, are depicted as rabid beserkers. They were a violent race, there's no getting away from it, but they were also a complex one and this series makes a genuine attempt to address that. There is, perhaps, a little too much cross-over with the Anglo-Saxon social convention of the time, but the amount of effort that has gone into making the programme look and feel authentic (if not sound - I'm not sure anyone can nail an eighth century Norse accent) is impressive. I have particularly enjoyed the sailing parts, as the Vikings' mastery of the seas is something we don't yet truly understand.

One of the reasons the Vikings are so badly misrepresented is that although there is much archeological evidence for how they lived and died, there are few resources on paper. They simply didn't write much down. But we do know they were trading as far afield as the Middle East by the ninth century and may even have got as far as Baghdad. They also spread into Constantinople and Russia. Their dominance in the North of England was natural, given that it was good farming land, close to their original home, relatively wealthy and populated by a people who were not naturally as tribal and aggressive.

The series features the famous attack on Lindisfarne in June 793, which in one brief event created the modern perception of the Vikings as crazed, godless warriors. They were, instead, raiders who didn't understand the significance of Christianity. But over the following three centuries, Christianity spread slowly through Scandinavia, changing the structure of society and making it far more like the Germanic countries to the south. That is not the remit of this series however, which dwells on the earlier and more dramatic events.

A very small point, but one I was also impressed with, is the use of colour. For anyone living at the time, almost everything was grey, from most clothing (even if it didn't start out that way) to building materials, to the moment of dawn most favourable for an attack. Colour, particularly vivid colours such as gold, silver, blue and red, were rare and denote a special incident, or a significant act. Usually, television trashes that completely and the noblewomen are clad in green velvet or something that looks suspiciously like satin. But that hasn't happened here. The series also features Ragnar Lothbrok's shieldmaiden wife. Shieldmaidens are an interesting phenomenon of Norse sagas and an interesting contrast to the silent 'peaceweaver' females in Germanic literature of the time.

So, as a sometime 'scholar' of Anglo-Saxon, I recommend Vikings wholeheartedly. To anyone writing fiction in the period, and to anyone interested in it, it will be valuable in terms of period look and feel. And it has Travis Fimmel as Ragnar Lothbrok and as you can see below he's really very...sorry, what was I saying?

*I am watching the series 'on demand'. It will be returning for another season next year.