The main role in the film is played by award-winning British actor Chiwetel Ejiofor. |
In a few days’ time, Twelve
Years a Slave will open in UK cinemas: a new film by the mightily talented
– and strikingly named – British director Steve McQueen, who has been
the recipient not only of various film gongs, but also of the Turner art prize.
The film features McQueen’s long-term collaborator, the (equally talented)
actor Michael Fassbender, and, as with the duo’s other recent films Hunger (about Bobby Sands) and Shame (about sex addiction), I fully expect that Twelve Years will be both brilliant and, in places, hard viewing. Brutally
hard viewing, in fact: as the title makes clear, the subject is slavery.
Indeed, the film’s unflinching depiction of the punishments and physical abuse inflicted
on slaves has already caused controversy: reportedly, at a screening at the
Toronto Film Festival, several people walked out.
During a recent BBC news item on the film,
Michael Fassbender said of the violence: “I just felt it was necessary –
because that’s the reality of it. And if we really wanted to do justice to
[the] story, who are we to decide where to censor?”
I agree with him, and yet – lacking a strong stomach myself,
and dreading not just the physical but the emotional abuse depicted (one review
says that a scene in which a female slave is separated from her young children
is even more gruelling) – I’ve been wondering whether I’ll have the courage to
watch this film. I don’t want to wimp out – especially when the subject is such
an important one. But violence and trauma on the big screen can be overwhelming,
in a way that they aren’t on the page. And so, to give myself at least an idea of
what to expect, I decided that first I should read the book on which the film
is based.
I’m very glad I’ve read it – and not just because it’s given
me a heads-up on the film. I’m wondering, in fact, why on earth I’ve got to grand
old age of 43 without someone pressing this book into my hands. It is an
extraordinary memoir, and an extraordinary primary source: a first-hand account
of what it was like to be a slave working in the cotton and sugar cane
plantations of the southern United States, written by a man who had a great narrative gift.
That man was Solomon Northup, a free-born African-American who, in his 30s (a married man, with 3 young children), was kidnapped
and sold into slavery in Washington. The year was 1841. Twelve years later he regained his
freedom, and embarked immediately on writing an account of his experiences. The
finished work - which was first published that same year, 1853 - is a gripping, desperately moving read.
Northrup was clearly a talented writer: his story has as
many vividly drawn characters, as much fascinating detail, as much drama,
conflict and heartache as any novelist could wish for. In addition, however,
what makes this book agonisingly compelling is its intense flavour of recent personal experience, plus Northrup’s
constant awareness that those of his fellow slaves who had not died in the
weeks since he regained his freedom were still, even as he wrote, enduring the
inhuman treatment he was describing, without any prospect of release except
through death.
Not only that, but Northup knew there were many people in
his country at the time who argued that the life of a slave was a happy one; he
stresses repeatedly that the astounding brutality he describes is not an exaggeration.
This brings Michael Fassbender’s comment to mind again: “If we really wanted to
do justice to Solomon’s story, who are we to decide where to censor?” How could
they justify underplaying the
suffering that Northup had described so eloquently and urgently?
But Northup’s is not a story of unremitting brutality. Bought
and sold several times, he encounters kind slave owners as well as cruel ones,
and what makes the memoir yet more fascinating is this breadth of experience
and the fact that his views are so nuanced. The kind slave owner is a rare
creature, Northup says, but he wants the reader to know that such a person does
exist. One such is William Ford:
…there never was a
more kind, noble, candid, Christian man than William Ford. The influences and
associations that had always surrounded him, blinded him to the inherent wrong
at the bottom of the system of Slavery. He never doubted the moral right of one
man holding another in subjection…. Brought up under other circumstances and
other influences, his notions would undoubtedly have been different.
Nevertheless, he was a model master… and fortunate was the slave who came to
his possession. Were all men such as he, Slavery would be deprived of more than
half its bitterness.
[p.90]
Another is a twenty-year-old single woman called Mary McCoy,
whom Northup describes in such angelic terms that I was reminded of Dickens:
She owns about a
hundred working hands, besides a great many house servants, yard boys, and
young children…. She is beloved by all her slaves, and good reason indeed have
they to be thankful that they have fallen into such gentle hands. Nowhere on
the bayou are there such feasts, such merrymaking, as at young Madam McCoy’s.
Thither, more than to any other place, do the old and the young for miles
around love to repair in the time of the Christmas holidays; for nowhere else
can they find such delicious repasts; nowhere else can they hear a voice
speaking to them so pleasantly. No one is so well beloved – no one fills so
large a space in the hearts of a thousand slaves, as young Madam McCoy…
[p.284]
While Northup’s sojourns with humane owners are
unfortunately brief, his discriminating eye does not desert him when he comes
to describe those who have done him terrible wrongs. He can see, for example,
the damage done to the family of the hideously cruel slave owner Edwin Epps, as
his twelve-year-old son, who “possessed some noble qualities”, is taught to
mistreat slaves, young and old, in imitation of his father.
Northup also paints arresting portraits of the slaves about
him, from the elderly Uncle Abram, to the young mother Eliza who is separated,
agonisingly, from both her children; from Lethe, consumed with violent rage at
her situation, to Patsey, who suffers horribly because she is a target for the
lustful attentions of Epps (played by Fassbender in the film), thereby earning
the hatred of his wife – a hatred that turns out to be life-threatening.
Northup brings us among these people, and takes us with them
to the cotton fields, where we see in detail the slaves’ punishing daily routine. Being a
resourceful, intelligent man, with useful skills – for example in engineering
and violin playing – Northup gains a few privileges from some masters (though not
all these ‘privileges’ are desirable). With Northup we experience an attempted
escape through a crocodile-infested swamp, the hard-earned comfort of Christmas
celebrations, endless fear-filled working days, and his extraordinarily
courageous attempts to fight back (literally) against a cruel master (with Dickens
already in mind I inevitably thought of Nicholas Nickleby here, although Northup – unlike Nicholas – suffers an attempted lynching for his
pains).
The story of how he came, ultimately, to regain his freedom
is so nail-bitingly dramatic that it could have come straight from the pen – or
laptop – of a Hollywood scriptwriter. It is simply breathtaking to remember
that this is a true story. But what is most heart-rending about the denouement
is the reaction of the other slaves as Northup – or ‘Platt’, as his owners have
called him – says goodbye:
“Oh? Platt,” she
cried, tears streaming down her face, “you’re goin’ to be free – you’re goin’
way off yonder, where we’ll nebber see ye any more. You’ve saved me a good many
whippins, Platt; I’m glad you’re goin’ to be free – but oh! De Lord, de Lord!
What’ll become of me?”
[p.308]
An enslaved woman with her slaver - 1850s, New Orleans.The Burns Archive (Burns Archive via Newsweek, 2.4.2011.) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons |
The UK premiere of Twelve Years a Slave will take place on October 18th.
You can view the film's trailer here.
H.M. Castor's website is here.
I don't know if I'll see the movie, but your review of the book is excellent.
ReplyDeleteReally glad to read your comments on reading the original "Twelve Years" book. The sort of reading that might just make it possible to watch the film itself, though I'm still not sure.
ReplyDeleteThank you Harriet, certainly a film to see, if I can bear it. And another book to read, most definitely.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Harriet! You've inspired me. I'm going to read it!
ReplyDeleteMany thanks Petrea, Penny, Mark and Caroline. It's *definitely* worth reading and, with such a strong team involved in the film, I'm sure that's worth seeing too if you can bear it.
ReplyDeleteThanks Harriet, am so looking forward to this film, which sounds wrong in a way, like 'liking' something horrible on FB. But still a brilliant team tackling a subject which in the past has rarely (if ever?) tackled properly and seriously.
ReplyDeleteI absolutely agree, Catherine - I can't think of a better team to do it. I'd be really interested to hear what you think of the film when you've seen it.
ReplyDelete