London, 1794.
Revolution creeps across the channel, coffee houses seethe with gossip and the
City is full of upstarts, émigrés and speculators. But even in unruly
times, daughters need husbands. For five City men, the question is how to
get them.
The
daughters. Motherless Alathea, whose charms are
grown disturbing, uses the whole of London exactly as she pleases.
Harriet, Georgiana, Marianne and Everina are cosseted at home, but home is not
always a safe place. As Claude Belladroit, piano-master, remarks, what’s
the point of locking the shutters when danger comes through the front door?
In the shadow of Tyburn gibbet,
Vittorio Cantabile, exile and instrument-maker, also has a daughter. Born
with a deformity her father cannot forgive, Annie is far from cosseted.
In her father’s workshop, resentments are fashioned as well as pianofortes, and
dreams are smashed without mercy.
Fathers
and daughters; mothers and daughters; husbands and wives; girls and boys; the
pursued and the pursuing. Whether in gilded drawing room or dusty
workshop, when a city is infected with
sedition, everything is reflected through a distorting prism of jealousy,
revenge and sexual devilry.
Katharine Grant
Author of Sedition
in conversation with Theresa
Breslin
Theresa: I love the title. It has enormous impact - the way it sounds and the freight the word carries.
Katharine: Titles are so important, aren’t they! When I began work on this book, I called it
the ‘Piano Book’, or the ‘Goldberg Book’, because it features both a piano and
Bach’s variations. But I remembered a previous
conversation with an editor who listened patiently whilst I outlined a plot,
then said, ‘but what’s the book actually about?’ Asking the same question of this book, the
answer was clear. Sedition. Short and snappy, it stuck.
Theresa: The novel
is set in a very particular year.
Katharine: Yes, a very particular year. In Paris, the Terror came to gruesome climax;
in London there were treason trials.
1794 was a year of political sedition in Europe and I liked the idea
that domestic sedition was its mirror.
But I was also very taken with the discovery from Amanda Foreman’s excellent
book that Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire, in Paris midst all the 1789 summer
turmoil, was overwhelmed in her hotel not by rioting crowds but by tradesmen,
including stay makers, and that she went to the opera. As history unfolds, ordinary life goes
on. In Sedition, though the City coffeehouses seethe with émigrés, spies
and speculators, domestic concerns still prevail. I find that to be true. Even on 9/11, though we were all shattered, those
not directly involved bought groceries, made tea, helped children with
homework, cleaned the loo.
Theresa: Also, it’s
close to the end of a century, which logically should make no difference, yet…
Katharine: It was a time of transition: classical music moving towards romantic –
Mozart died in 1791, Schubert was born in 1797;
the pianoforte was taking over from the harpsichord; Wordsworth and
Coleridge published the first edition of The
Lyrical Ballads in 1798; in 1800,
Alessandro Volta invents the battery;
the industrial revolution was gathering pace. There’s a nervous energy about the turn of
the eighteenth century which made it very attractive as a setting.
Theresa: The story
is political as well as personal, seamlessly interwoven.
Katharine: The ‘city’ men, fathers of five of the
girls, congregate in a coffee-house that shipmasters, traders and activists
frequent. The coffee-houses were conduits for gossip, political pamphlets
circulated, and news, both British and foreign, was exchanged. They witness,
read about and discuss current events, though always, always with an eye for
trade.
Theresa: One of the
characters picks up a leaflet entitled ‘Pantisocracy and Aspheterism’. My
computer spell check didn’t recognise these terms and couldn’t even make a suggestion
as to what they might be!
Katharine: A stroke of serendipity! When writing the
book I happened to be reading a biography of Coleridge and came across this. It
fitted perfectly.
(Comment from Theresa : This chimes with HG Celia Rees last
post on Jan 18th)
Theresa: Tell me
about the music. It’s integral to the story.
Katharine: Music was a big and natural part of my life.
I was brought up in very musical household. We all played musical instruments
and our nanny, who never liked to waste time, taught me and my siblings to sing
in parts in the bath. My parents hosted
marvellous musicians and we were allowed to mingle and listen to performances. The musicians were so open and kind. Sometimes they allowed us to play their
instruments. So music’s something I grew
up with and is still a source of great joy in my life. I learned the Variations
– or as many as I could master in the time – with my characters, and continue
to learn them. Practising is also a form
of therapy. I’m a big-time stresser! Music, being all-encompassing, leaves no room
for angsting about the boiler, the roof, the all important key that’s strangely
missing.
Theresa: I found the
detail fascinating. The underarm pomanders as a deodorant. The arches at Newgate becoming narrower as the
condemned person approached the site of their execution.
Katharine: All true! I drew on the resources of Glasgow
University library, e.g. dress pattern books and fashion. I discovered that
shoes had garden scenes painted on their heels (Sigh from Theresa. ‘I have
a pair with similar on their soles!) I studied (lots of) paintings. I researched
by ‘walking’ London and absorbing how it is today. I think it can be a mistake
to block out the present. We can use the present to see what it was like in the
past. In some ways the scene locations are not so different now: noisy, air
polluted, raucous etc.
Theresa: There are
laugh-out-loud funny bits which appealed to my sense of humour. And twists of wit… The storyteller stating that the selection of the bass A string
from the harpsichord was the most suitable to make a hangman’s noose for a
scorned lover!
Katharine: Ah, indeed. That carried a punch.
Theresa: In contrast
with above - there is some very dark matter within the book.
Katharine: Yes, very difficult themes. But I was given some advice very early on by
Michael Schmidt, the poet. ‘Be brave’,
he said. To me, this didn’t mean
courting dark themes for the sake of sensation; it meant going where the story
had to go. Alathea Sawneyford’s
character, for example, has been formed by her experiences. It makes her complicated, but also allows
you, as a writer, to explore places you wouldn’t otherwise explore.
Theresa: In The Literary Review, Jonathan Barnes
talks of plait[ing] together comedy and
tragedy with sly skill. Hard to plait?
Katharine: Yes – he was referring to the concert
scene. It was hard, but actually, by the
time I got to the concert scene I was so inside that book that the plaiting wasn’t
conscious … When I found the voice for the book I realised that nothing could
be purely description. It all had to add to the individual. I took out anything
that was descriptive unless it revealed or reinforced character, so the
plaiting – and pressing the delete button – had become second nature.
Theresa: Would you
like to talk a bit about voice and perspective in the historical novel?
Katharine: That’s what takes the time, as you’ll know
only too well! Voice and perspective are
key to all novels. It took me quite a time to find Sedition's voice. Not too arch,
not too knowing, not too intrusive. As for perspective, that took months
– years – of paring away until I reached the book’s core. It became an obsession, especially after I read
Virginia Woolf’s insight that the success (in writerly terms) of all novels
lies “not so much in their freedom from faults - indeed we tolerate the
grossest errors in them all - but in the immense persuasiveness of a mind which
has completely mastered its perspective".
That really gripped me. As I
wrote Sedition, I knew what was
necessary and just hoped to goodness I’d found it!
Theresa: I think you
certainly did!
Thank you, Katherine and Teresa. "Sedition" sounds a wonderful novel.
ReplyDeleteThanks to both of you for sharing this fascinating conversation. I 'lived' the period while writing Sovay, so I'm looking forward to reading Sedition. Always amazed at how different writers can look at exactly the same period and write completely different books!
ReplyDeleteMust read!
ReplyDelete