It’s astonishing what you discover when you
are doing the research for a novel. In my first 17th century Fenland
novel, Flood, Tom Bennington, brother
of the narrator, Mercy Bennington, is injured twice in the same leg, develops
gangrene and suffers an amputation. In the second novel, Betrayal, I alternate between the two as first-person narrators.
Tom goes to London to resume his legal studies
at Gray’s Inn , while searching for the missing
royal charter which granted possession of the common lands to the fenlanders.
While in London ,
Tom also hopes to have a wooden “peg leg” fitted, to improve his balance and
mobility.
What did I know about artificial legs in
the mid-seventeenth century?
Precisely nothing – which led me to Ambroise
Paré.
Nowadays we are all familiar with the
amazingly sophisticated artificial limbs which provide the chance of a near normal
life to accident victims and soldiers, but people have lost limbs through
accidents and war injuries from earliest times. They were not left helpless.
Greeks, Romans and Egyptians all made attempts to provide replacements for such
tragic losses, but inevitably these were very simple and crude. Things did not
improve much over the centuries. Remember those illustrations of Long John
Silver and his wooden leg? Such basic legs were still common for much of the
twentieth century, as attested by photographs.
Yet back in the sixteenth century – yes,
that’s not a mistake, the sixteenth
century – there was a new approach to this painful problem. Enter Ambroise Paré.
Ambroise Paré |
Ambroise Paré was born in Bourg-Hersent,
near Laval , France , in 1510 and followed in the
footsteps of his elder brother, who was a barber-surgeon. This was a catch-all
profession, covering everything from cutting hair and pulling teeth to
stitching up wounds and carrying out amputations. His basic professional
training took place at the most prestigious hospital in Paris , the Hôtel-Dieu, where he was taught
the standard practices of sixteenth-century surgery. These included some which
seem horrific to us now – wounds would be treated with boiling oil, and after
an amputation the severed limb was cauterised with a red hot iron.
Francis I King of France |
Paré was both a compassionate man and
brilliant innovator. Like most surgeons, his first major experience as a young
man was on the battlefield, in the Piedmont campaign of Francis I in 1537-8. Two
episodes during these battlefield experiences had a profound effect on him. On
one occasion he was horrified when he saw severely wounded men put out of their
misery by having their throats cut by their comrades – it determined him to
devote himself to improving the care of those with gunshot and sword wounds and
never to abandon his attempts to save life.
On another occasion, there were so many men
with wounds that he ran out of supplies of the hot oil used to scald them.
Having read of a method used by the Romans, he mixed up a salve of oil of
roses, egg white and turpentine. He dreaded that the men whose wounds were only
salved would die. Instead, the following morning those treated with hot oil
were in severe pain, their wounds inflamed, and some had died, while those
treated with the makeshift salve were making a good recovery. Subsequently, Paré
used the same treatment for amputations and never cauterised again, finding
that those treated by the old and violent method frequently died of shock or
infection, while his new method spared his patients a great deal of unnecessary
pain and resulted in a far better rate of recovery.
A further problem with amputations was the
risk of the patient haemorrhaging to death, if cauterisation failed to seal the
arteries. Paré introduced ligature of the arteries to prevent this happening.
It seems extraordinary that his life-saving techniques did not at once become
widespread, for he did not keep his methods secret, as some surgeons at the
time were apt to do (for example in the case of obstetrics). Instead Paré
published extensively, explaining his methods in detail; his first work, based on
his treatment of war wounds was The
method of curing wounds caused by arquebus and firearms (1545). His use of
ligature was discussed in his Ten Books
on Surgery (1564).
What was to become of these young soldiers
who lost an arm or a leg in battle? Cast out of the army, crippled for life,
they faced a bleak future. Some resorted to suicide. Paré believed that it
should be possible to make life more bearable for them. Curious and inventive
as ever, he developed the art of prosthetics beyond anything before envisaged.
He designed artificial legs with jointed knees and ankles, arms with jointed
elbows and wrists, hands with complex fingers.
Paré prosthetic arm |
It was around this time that elaborate
automata had become popular as toys for the wealthy, and the mechanisms of
clocks also grew more complex. Many of the same principles were applied by Paré
to his artificial limbs.
Paré prosthetic leg - interior & exterior |
Instead of simple wooden props, his metal
legs were intended to reproduce as nearly as possible the movement of the human
leg, but they were very heavy. Some of his experimental limbs were made in
collaboration with a lockmaker he refers to as “Le Petit Lorrain”. Was he a
short man called Lorrain? A man from Lorrain? Such a man would have similar
skills to a clockmaker, for this was also a time of complex locks. Lorrain
designed a type of artificial leg using leather to reduce the weight. The
extraordinary breakthrough in prosthetics pioneered by Paré was recorded in
detail in his book Ten Books on Surgery
(1564), which was lavishly illustrated.
Paré prosthetic hand |
As well as providing limbs for amputees, Paré
also developed false eyes for those who had suffered eye injuries, another
common battlefield wound from flying fragments of shrapnel, in this new age of
hand-held firearms.
Paré’s work was not only concerned with war
wounds and their aftermath. He also served as surgeon to four successive kings
of France :
Henry II, Francis II, Charles IX and Henry III. Indeed, he was so valued by
Charles IX that the king saved his life during the St Bartholomew’s Day Massacre
(1572); as a Huguenot Paré was in considerable danger. He continued as the
royal surgeon until his death in Paris
in 1590.
In peacetime medicine, one of his principal
interests was obstetrics. At a time when most babies were delivered by
midwives, surgeons would normally only become involved when something was
seriously wrong, endangering mother or baby or both. At the time there were
usually only two options: a Caesarean, which generally killed the mother, or
the dismemberment of the unborn baby, killing the child. Paré believed that
such deaths were often unnecessary, like the deaths of his soldier patients. He
developed methods of manipulating the baby in
utero in order to achieve a safe delivery. He wrote a treatise on midwifery
and trained other surgeons in his methods, which must have saved hundreds of
lives.
Title page of Paré's Oeuvres |
As an expert anatomist, he also had an
interest in forensic medicine and the presentation of legal evidence. Another
of his books was Reports in Court
covering the subject of what we would now call expert medical witness evidence.
Above all, Paré was activated by two
principles: he devoted his life to developing surgical, medical and mechanical
techniques for saving and improving lives, and he believed above all in sparing
his patients unnecessary pain. It earned him the title of “the gentle surgeon”.
So why is he virtually unknown today? And
why – going back to my initial discovery of his mechanical legs – did it take
so long for his ideas to become commonplace? In the matter of cauterising
wounds, it seems to have been a sheer pig-headed refusal to abandon long-established
practices. As for the prosthetic limbs, perhaps they were just too complicated
and expensive to come into general use.
Whatever the reasons, I feel Ambroise Paré
should be celebrated as the man who first saw that surgery need not be a form
of unavoidable but agonising butchery; instead his gentle practices could save
and transform lives, although, as a devout man, he always attributed his
successes not to himself, but to God. He laid the foundations of modern
surgery, something we should all be grateful for.
“There
are five duties of surgery: to remove what is superfluous, to restore what has
been dislocated, to separate what has grown together, to reunite what has been
divided, and to redress the defects of nature.” – Ambroise Paré
So, in Betrayal,
when my protagonist Tom Bennington arrives in London , he seeks the help of a barber surgeon
who is an admirer of Ambroise Paré, determined to carry on with his work.
Ann Swinfen
http://www.annswinfen.com
Thank you for this - you're so right. Pare was far worthier of admiration than most 'heroes', and yet is little known.
ReplyDeleteMy father had a battered paperback book, published in the '30s, called 'Devils, Drugs and Doctors.' It was a history of medicine, and one of the people celebrated in it, for whom the author had great enthusiasm, was Pare. I'm glad to be reminded of him. He was a remarkable man.
How interesting, Susan! I wonder whether that book is still around. Must have a search. Pare seems to have been a quite remarkable man, so clever, so ingenious, and so kind. I've created a surgeon in my novel Betrayal who is obsessed with carrying on his work - eccentric, but also kindly.
ReplyDeleteJust found a secondhand copy and ordered it! Thanks for the info, Susan.
ReplyDelete