Battle of the Armada |
The defeat of the enormous and well-trained
Spanish Armada fleet by the smaller English fleet in the English Channel during
the summer of 1588 is probably one of the most famous naval battles in history,
along with Salamis, Lepanto and Trafalgar, not least because the outcome hung
in the balance until a strong southwest wind drove the Spanish ships into the
North Sea.
As the English said afterwards, in
thankfulness mixed with perhaps a touch of complacency, ‘God blew his winds and
they were scattered’.
However, events before and after the great
battle, which culminated off Gravelines, are rather less well known. Elsewhere
in this blog I have written about the retaliatory expedition by England against Spain in 1589, known as the Counter
Armada (http://bit.ly/1DNSaAB) but other
events surrounding this iconic date are interesting.
Leading the Spanish army in their north
European territories was the Duke of Parma, a skilled and experienced commander,
the greatest general of his day, who totally outclassed Leicester .
In battle after battle, the combined English and Dutch forces were defeated or
just managed to hold back the Spanish. In one, the battle of Zutphen in 1586, Leicester ’s nephew, the gifted and much-loved Sir Philip
Sidney, was fatally wounded, dying on 17 October, not quite 32 years old.
Leicester remained in the Low
Countries , although relations with the Dutch leaders were becoming
strained. His original principal ally, William of Orange, charismatic leader of
the United Dutch, had been assassinated by a Spaniard in 1584, and Leicester
himself may have begun to suffer from ill health. (He was to die in 1588,
shortly after the defeat of the Armada.) His position was further undermined in
late 1586 by Elizabeth ’s
antagonism to his planned extension of the military campaigns, and her refusal
to provide adequate finance for his dwindling army, which was short of rations,
materiel, and pay.
Matters came to a head at the siege of
Sluys. This vital deep-water port on the Channel was in the hands of the United
Provinces, but was eyed greedily by the Duke of Parma, who laid siege to it on
12 June, 1587. King Philip of Spain
had long been planning a combined naval and land-force invasion of England . The port of Sluys would provide an essential piece
in the invasion plan.
The garrison at Sluys was provided by an
English regiment, commanded by Sir Roger Williams, together with Dutch allies.
Williams was a Welshman, an experienced soldier (later to write a book on
military theory) and a determined Protestant. Leicester himself valued him
highly. Williams and his soldiers made a courageous stand against Parma , but the odds were
against them. Having cut off Sluys from all supply routes by land or sea, the
Spanish began their bombardment on 24 June. The garrison was short of food, but, even more dangerously, short of gunpowder and shot. They fought valiantly until
all their supplies were exhausted, leaving them helpless. On 4 August, they
were forced to surrender.
Thanks partly to poor communications
between the Spanish invading navy and the Spanish army stationed in the Low
Countries, Philip of Spain’s intended two-pronged attack on England failed,
and Sluys did not, after all, play a major part in the conflict the following
year. His intention, planned on paper in faraway Spain ,
was for his navy to cripple the English fleet, then convey his army across the
Channel in barges to carry out a land invasion, marching north from the south
coast to seize London .
(A remarkably similar operation, in the opposite direction, to the D-Day
landings nearly four hundred years later.)
The Spanish Armada was defeated, its ships
scattered, the Spanish army still confined to the Low
Countries . England
could celebrate. And did. Church bells were rung. Services of thanksgiving were
held. Bonfires were lit on street corners throughout London and other towns. And no doubt a good
many citizens passed the night away at drunken parties.
But that was not quite the end of the
story.
The English fleet returned, bearing the
heroes, the soldiers and sailors, who had saved England from invasion. But while
the civilians celebrated, the men on the ships waited. And waited. Where was
the pay they had been promised? Where, indeed, was the food to feed them?
Supplies ran out. No one seemed to have planned for this. No one was prepared
to take responsibility for them. It was not the first time, nor would it be the
last, when a returning victorious army was to prove a neglected embarrassment.
The men remained on the ships, many of them
tied up at Deptford, and they began to fall ill. And then to die. Men who
seemed healthy enough one day would not rise the following morning, having died
inexplicably in the night. Others would collapse suddenly and without warning.
Some terrible disease was rife amongst the men, and in panic the authorities
refused to allow them to land. It is now believed to have been both typhus and
‘the bloody flux’ (dysentery). This may have saved civilian lives, but it meant
that the very men who had fought and saved the country were left to starve and
die of disease. In their droves. This was the discreditable end to the Armada
story.
Sadly, it was not unique.
Ann Swinfen
http://www.annswinfen.com
What a terrible end to the story, and how embittered their last days must have been. I always find Deptford a sad place, and perhaps its air is informed with the historic injustice. Thank you for telling us about it.
ReplyDeleteMost interesting article. I believe it also helped the English that the Duke of Medina Sidonia, who took over command of the Armada fleet when the Marquis of Santa Cruz died, wasn't a naval man although he was a skilled tactician on land. The Duke of Parma was obviously a remarkable commander. As you say, Robert Dudley was no match for him. How dreadful that the men who had fought so bravely were let down by their country; sadly,a common story.
ReplyDeleteYes, I was quite angry when I discovered what happened to the men. What made it worse was what happened the following year in the expedition to Portugal. Someone commenting on my novel about it said how terrible, if even some of it was true. Well, all of it was true. We think of modern instances, but it's nothing new. I agree, Harriet. The Duke of Medina Sidonia didn't want the command. He knew he wasn't fit for it.
ReplyDelete