I’ve spent this week at the Scattered Authors’ summer retreat at Charney Manor in
Oxfordshire. The manor is thirteenth century, with Elizabethan additions, and
the adjacent churchyard has graves from many centuries so it’s easy to feel especially
historyish. There are over twenty writers around, several of whom write
historical fiction. There may even be another History Girl or two in the
vicinity…
I’m typing this in the
garden while a scream of swifts dives and wheels around us, and I wonder, what
do you call a group of historical writers? A chattering, perhaps, as in
choughs? I don’t often have the chance to
chatter to other historical novelists so I wanted to use this post, falling
so serendipitously on the last day of Charney 2017, to reflect some thoughts
of today’s writers of historical fiction, particularly for young
people.
Several writers joined me,
all of whom have written historical fiction, sometimes straight, sometimes with
a twist – an element of the paranormal; an alternate history, or even a comedy
diary. Our reasons for writing historical fiction varied. I fell in love with
history, especially that of the nineteenth and twentieth century, via an
inspirational teacher, whereas Lynne Benton suffered from a boring history
teacher at grammar school, which made her determined to write books which made
history interesting and exciting to young readers.
Michelle Lovric only ever
wanted to write historical fiction. She loves narratives where the characters
have to deal with more severe problems than can be solved by Google and mobile
phones, with more visceral anxieties and more bodily risk.
Tim Collins enjoyed the
challenge of applying the aesthetics of the comedy diary to historical subjects,
and talked about the humour sparked when modern sensibility meets historical
context – as in Blackadder.
Kath Langrish remembered the
excitement surrounding the Tutankhamen exhibition at the British Library in
1972. She wasn’t able to travel to see it, but was given the book about it as a
school prize. The book promptly fell to pieces, but her interest in the Egyptians
– and in history – didn’t.
Katherine Roberts was
motivated by a desire to write about horses, which kept her settings
historical, and she loves to weave magic and spirituality into her stories in a
way that wouldn't work with a modern setting.
Mary Hoffman admitted to
loving the freedom of writing parallel histories where she was the absolute
world expert on Talia, her alternative version of Renaissance Italy. However,
she also writes straight historical novels, saying that she loves the research
involved.
She had had to give up history at school but we all agreed with her
that history was accessible with ‘books and a brain’. Likewise we all
recognised that lovely serendipity when you find a fact that really chimes with
your story.
Most of us
agreed that writing for young readers was harder than writing for adults,
mostly because of what you can’t take for granted. We all cared about
historical detail and accuracy, but never at the expense of story. I have a
horror of my books being presented as ‘worthy’.
The talk meandered through
Icelandic sagas, Venice, portrait painting, sculpture, medicine, spirituality –
to be honest, my head was reeling. We considered such issues as whether
historical fiction should say something about today’s society – I think it inevitably
does, because unless you aim for some sort of pastiche, any work will always,
to an extent, reflect the time in which it was produced.
There were only a few of us,
but between us we had very different reasons for writing historical
fiction, and were attracted to widely differing periods. I suppose that’s why a blog like The History Girls works – there are
so many different voices and perspectives on the past. As Kath Langrish said, so much exciting stuff happened in the past, and if you discount it, you’re not left with much.
The swifts wheeled and dived
the whole time we talked. Their ancestors were probably here, doing exactly that, during
most of the periods we discussed. I hope their descendants will still be doing so in the
future, when the writers of that time gather on the lawn and talk about their
books set in the turbulent 2010s.
Lovely!
ReplyDeleteWhat a lovely account of your historical fiction discussion at Charney Manor. The atmosphere in that place always feels full of the most kindly shades.
ReplyDeleteThank you for a wonderful conversation under the shade of that tree. It is quite amazing how you have processed all our passionate comments into a lovely coherent post. You must be a ... writer!
ReplyDeleteYes, thank you, Sheena, for condensing our fascinating conversation into such an excellent post. As Michelle put it, you must be a... writer!
ReplyDeleteLovely post. Sheena!
ReplyDeleteYes, thank you for creating something coherent out of all that!
ReplyDelete