
The biography
certainly covered the time-span of my “work-in-progress”. Eleanor Marx was born
in 1855, but earlier in the 19th Century was there on the pages,
looking back at the young lives of both her parents. The book seemed a good “starter”
to glance though, so I began on the first chapters . . . and then I kept
reading, way past the point of any practical research.
Eleanor Marx, as revealed by Rachel Holmes, is a wonderfully compelling character and, furthermore, the sweep of her life reads like the plot of a classic novel.
Eleanor
never went to school - unlike her two older sisters who benefited from a burst of prosperity- but she was too
curious about everything to stay uneducated. She learned to read and
write early, and was an eager student of subjects she valued, taught by
various friends and by her father. Surrounded by books, if not much else, Eleanor
loved reading Grimm’s folk tales and reciting Shakespeare’s plays and
was
a keen little letter-writer herself. She grew up speaking German, French and English and, as an adult enjoyed learning languages. As Eleanor moved into her teens, she began helping
her adored father with his work, notes, translations and correspondence. By the
time she was sixteen, her own life was becoming absorbed in social struggle, and in the dilemma of balance relationships
between man and woman equally.
Yet this
is only the start of Holmes sweeping biography. Through the pages, we see Eleanor living so closely with all
the social struggles of the nineteenth century that she almost seemed a kind
of Mother Courage to me. What was particularly valuable about this
biography is the very width of its context.

Although Eleanor trained as an actor, she had little success but nevertheless those same skills, and the warmth of her personality, made her into a great public communicator. She travelled constantly as a speaker, even to America to speak to the worker’s unions, and was acknowledged almost everywhere for her knowledge and understanding of her father’s arguments, beliefs and philosophy.
Holmes looks into this revolutionary age, revealing some uncomfortable truths such as the lack of empathy
between “society suffragettes” and working-class women; the active animosity
between the various anarchist and parliamentarian Socialist parties; the English
workers general rejection of European Socialist perspective and solidarity, the rise of antisemitism and
more. Despite some progress, this was not a trouble-free time, nor was her own personal life free of conflict
and deep tragedy.
However, as I read about the different issues she faced, it was impossible not to feel that Eleanor Marx’s life echoed then with many questions and problems that exist - maybe in growing intensity - in our 21st century society, which adds a darker note the journey.
Yet, reading this biography, there is no doubt that Eleanor Marx was remarkable. Through Rachel Holmes enthusiastic writing, she is shown as a truly impressive
woman in her own right. And on she
goes, through these great flowing pages of history, constantly organising, writing;
campaigning; addressing conferences and rallies; travelling and serving her
father’s cause, as she tries to face the hidden costs in her own life. One can only admire her generous heart and her bold hope for
the future. A remarkable book too - and the end of her story had me in tears.
Penny
Dolan
5 comments:
Sounds like a fascinating person, and a fascinating book.
Gosh, I must read it!
It is a wonderful biography and there are aspects of her personal life that I decided not to mention as they would "spoil the story" for anyone reading the book.
I didn't think this would be my kind of book when I started reading your review, but changed my mind by the end, as it seems it gives a perspective of Victorian England that is rarely seen. I shall keep a look out for it.
Great review, Penny.
I don't know much about Eleanor Marx - something I should remedy - but have the impression that she married an odd sort of man, one who was both compassionate socialist and campaigner, and, privately, a rat.
Another similarity that struck me between now and then is that E M was not formally educated but seems to have been better educated than most who were, including those who went to places like Eton.
Post a Comment