![]() |
| Ladakh's surreal landscape 1981 painted by me |
| Ladakh 2013 |
![]() |
| The palace at Leh 1981 |
| The palace at Leh with prayer flags 2013 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Ladakh's surreal landscape 1981 painted by me |
| Ladakh 2013 |
![]() |
| The palace at Leh 1981 |
| The palace at Leh with prayer flags 2013 |
![]() |
Below: Anatomy Theatre
Women played an important role in Napoleonic espionage. Rachel Charlotte Biggs was an English writer and spy. Between 1802 and 1816, she repeatedly visited France and Napoleon controlled Europe. She corresponded with British politicians and reported her observations about military strength, industry and agriculture and the political state. Her extraordinary story is told in the novel ‘Georgian Heroine’. Another was a countess who allegedly passed secrets to the British via coded embroidery patterns. Femalespies came in many guises and used imaginative ways in which to move intelligence across borders, including hiding micro letters in hatpins!
Fishermen’s wives and daughters also put themselves in danger by passing on information and giving shelter to royalist spies.
But among the many women spies, the one who really caught my attention was Arabella Williams, originally from Liverpool. Her handler was William Wickham. Wickham was a British diplomat who used his position in Bern as a cover to gather information and coordinate royalist organisations against France. Arabella became known as ‘le petit matelot’ – the little sailor – as she had acted as a courier passing papers between France and England for a number of years disguised as a sailor, without being caught. Arabella had her own property in France where she had lived for some years, which she also used as a safe house for other agents. One of her contacts was Abbé Ratel. Early in the war, Abbé Ratel organised a network of royalists to keep watch around the port of Boulogne and provide early warning of any invasion. Reports were sent to England through fishermen recruited by Ratel – who was reputed to have a very beautiful mistress.
Arabella was described as being petite, very pretty, lively and immensely busy. The group she belonged was extremely successful and despite the gendarmerie’s surveillance they managed to escape detection for many years. Sadly, I can find no portrait of Arabella though we do know that she was an English widow, the daughter of David Mallet, the poet and joint composer of ‘Rule Britannia’!
![]() |
| David Mallet |
In France, all those spying for Britain or sympathetic to the royalist cause had to evade the clutches of Napoleon’s Minister of Police, the notorious Joseph Fouché. He was ruthless in his pursuit of British spies or those in France with royalist sympathies, torturing and executing them. He was dubbed ‘the most feared man in France’ and even Napoleon was quoted as saying ‘I fear Fouché more than all the armies of Europe’.
Fouché began his career as a maths teacher and evolved into a moderate and then radical legislator. He cultivated every political movement of the day. After preaching clemency for Louis XVI, Fouché voted to send the King to the guillotine. After writing "The first Communist Manifesto of Modern Times" he became a multi-millionaire. He led the brutal repression of an anti-revolutionary movement, earning him the nickname ‘The Butcher of Lyon’. After serving Robespierre, Fouché engineered his overthrow and rose to Minister of Police under the Directory, which he then helped to overthrow before putting his network of informants in Napoleon’s service. After turning against the Emperor, Fouché served the new King Louis XVIII – whose brother he had helped send to the guillotine. Thus, Fouché served the Revolution, the Directory, the First Empire and the Restoration. His face was said to resemble a weasel – and his less flattering portraits bear this out!
The threat from spies in France and those with royalist sympathies was very real. There were several attempts to assassinate Napoleon, the most famous being in Paris on the evening of December 24th 1800. Almost certainly funded by the British, this very nearly succeeded when a cart exploded just after Napoleon’s carriage had passed, killing bystanders.
Malmaison, Empress Josephine’s country chateau, was the site of others, including the poisoned snuff put into a replica of Napoleon’s snuff box and placed on his desk there.
Although I have changed some of their dates and locations, many of the characters mentioned in my book ‘The King’s Agent’ are based on real people including ‘Le Petit Matelot’, Pipette, the fisherman’s wife, Abbé Ratel (disguised as Father Jacques) and, of course, the infamous Joseph Fouché.
‘The King’s Agent’ is the second novella in the ‘Soldier Spy’ trilogy, following the fortunes of the disgraced soldier, Captain Will Fraser and his wounded sergeant, Duncan Armstrong, recruited by the Alien Office to spy for King George’s government.


![]() |
| Brehon Bee Laws |
| Old Irish style bee hive |
In Britain and the rest of Europe the hives
were made of straw, coiled into the familiar cone shape and stitched together
with thin branches of brambles/blackberries stripped of their leaves and
thorns, called a ‘skep’ from the Anglo-Saxon word ‘skeppa’ meaning ‘basket.’ In
winter they would put straw tents over the skeps to keep out the elements,
called ‘hackles,’ if they weren’t in little stone nooks, or ‘boles,’ like those
of the monks of Lindisfarne. In Ireland, however, where cattle grazed outdoors
all year and little straw was harvested, I was told by local historians
sedgegrass was used instead, well up until the last century. The hives were
then thatched against the rain that fell all year round and kept against the
south wall of the ‘lios’ or wall of
the home area.
Bees were kept not only on farms but also at religious communities in early Christian times. Monks (managh) and nuns (cailecha) tended the sick and injured among their community, as well people in the surrounding area. One such cailecha was Gobnait, a woman who settled in West Cork and established a convent, or community of women. She became so well known for her healing, with honey as her staple medicine, that her fame spread and eventually, after her death, she became the patron saint of bees.
| 6th century ruins possibly of St Gobnait's community |
With bees such a vital part of the daily
lives of medieval Irish people, it is no surprise that they featured in the
Brehon laws. “Brehon” is an ancient Irish term for judge. Over the centuries
the judges accumulated a series of laws which they passed down orally from one
generation of judges to the next. To qualify to become any one of the various
levels of judges and lawyers (which in all likelihood were offshoots of the
poets (filidh) required that the
person study at one of the nemed
schools. It was a period of study that lasted a number of years in which they learned
poetry as well as the laws.
Under the Brehon laws there were five paths
to judgement: truth, duty, right, propriety and proper inquiries. These paths
ensured that each case was considered carefully. The choices were thrashed out beforehand by the
respective lawyers in a process called airthacra,
which was akin to hearing of legal arguments in modern court case. Most disputes, however, were usually settled
before they wound up in court.
During the early Christian period, from
about the 5th century to the 8th century the laws and law
cases were recorded by Christian clerics and ‘adjusted’ if it the laws didn’t
fit the Christian outlook. Most of our knowledge of early Irish or Brehon law
comes from these old Irish law texts, mainly composed in the 7th and 8th
centuries. Some of these texts have survived in a complete form in later
manuscripts (generally of the fourteenth to sixteenth centuries), but many are
to be found only in fragments. The best preserved collection of early Irish law
texts is that of the Senchás Mar,
"great tradition," which is likely to have been organized as a unit
about A.D. 800. The texts in this collection are all anonymous, and it is not
known where or by whom they were put together. However, most of the place-names
and personal names cited in the texts relate to the northern Midlands and
southern Ulster, so it is probable that the material derived from this area. It
may have been assembled in a monastic law school, such as that at Slane, County
Meath.
Much of the Brehon law is founded on the principle of restitution, rather than punishment, so often the judgments involved various types of compensation for any injury done. The cases and laws therefore encompassed much of what mattered in everyday life. The Senchás Mar originally consisted of 50 law texts broken up into three sections. There doesn’t seem to be a strict logic to the arrangements except that similar subjects are grouped together. For example, the law text relating to cats is followed by the law text relating to dogs.
![]() |
| Ranking of lawyers & other professionals in Ireland |
In the first third of the work there is a
general discussion of legal topics and a description of St Patrick’s role in
its codification. This essay is followed by laws on the formal seizure of
another’s property to enforce legal claims against him. There is also a
discussion on the acts regarding hostages, laws regarding the “free fief” and
fosterage fees, as well as free clientship and base clientship which were two
different classes in the highly stratified society that was Ireland. There were
also other texts dealing with the laws of marriage and divorce, the arrangement
of customary behaviour and the relationship of society to the church.
The surviving final third, like the first
third, is not complete by any means. It does have evidence that suggests it may
have contained laws on carpenters, coppersmiths and blacksmiths, sick
maintenance as well as trapping deer. It also has medical legal texts
“Judgments of Blood-lying” and “Judgements of Dian Cecht” (a legendary
physician).
Included in the middle section, the most
complete section, are the judgments dealing with trespass by domestic animals,
fencing obligations and other related topics. Here we can learn such
interesting judgements such as if an animal is killed in a jointly owned herd
and the culprit cannot be identified then a lot is cast across the whole herd.
The animal on which it falls is held to be responsible. Whether or not that
animal is punished is a mystery. Other interesting aspects discussed in this
section include rules for bringing water for a mill across a neighbour’s land.
Conflict in a situation like this is easily imaginable. A final section, which
understandably gets full discussion is "Judgements Concerning
Thefts."
It is in this middle section that the Bechbretha or “Bee Judgements” are
found. They include a discussion of trespass by honey bees. It’s there, for instance, we can learn that a
person who is blinded by a bee gets a hive in recompense. Or that there were penalties for a person who
moves a hive not belonging to them. And most reasonably we can learn that if a
person shakes or disturbs a hive and the bees should attack that person as a
result, the owner was free from liability for any injuries that might result.
The Brehon laws stretched back centuries
and through them we can understand the daily life of the ancient Irish. If the
laws are anything to go by it shows a society that relied heavily on mediation
and compensation, perhaps in attempt to avoid more violent acts of retribution,
vengeance and punishment.
Bee laws and the Brehon lawyers of the time come into play in my novel, In Praise of the Bees a USA Today Bestseller set in 6th century Ireland.Buy or find out more here or go to my website

Renaissance Venice
Travellers who visited in Venice in the 15th,
16th and 17th century never failed to marvel at the
number of courtesans in the city. Thomas Coryat writing in 1608 was astonished
to note that there were as many as twenty thousand courtesans operating in
Venice and said that “many are esteemed so loose that they are said to open
their quivers to every arrow.”
![]() |
| Venetian Courtesans |
The courtesans often dressed in clothing that
had revealing cleavage to the point even where the breasts were completely
exposed. Travellers on occasion mistakenly thought these were the ordinary
female citizens of Venice. But just as much as they might condemn the numbers
and their behaviour, the travellers’ descriptions of Venetian daily life in
which the courtesan featured prominently the city is praised as an example of
civic and social harmony. Two myths lying side by side.
Venice in fact was a vibrant and complex city
then, filled with merchants profiting from expanded trade opportunities and
proud of its republic standing. The government was organized around a multitude
of magistracies and councils and ruled by a doge, elected by a closed patrician
group, called the Great Council.
The people were generally a sober lot and
the women of their class and the nobility were seldom seen in public. When they
did, they too were sombrely dressed, in dark colours. 
Venetian widow
Venice was also crowded
with people who worked at the shipyards, at the fisheries, the glassworks and
other manufacturers in this blossoming commercial centre. Housing was difficult
to find, even among the wealthier classes, and few had the luxury (at least in
the 15th and 16th century) of owning their own palazzo.
Most had apartments or rooms in buildings, and some of the poorer classes
shared rooms. These conditions among a
booming commercial centre created intense rivalries among the young men of
various trades. Such competition often gave rise to faction fighting- sometimes
fought desperately over bridges like the Rialto. Enemies of any class could be
despatched in a dark alley and tossed in the canal.
Poised between these two sides of Venice
were the courtesans. There were two classes of courtesans that existed in
Venice. The first, cortigna onesta,
honest courtesan or intellectual courtesan and the cortigna lume, the lower class prostitutes who lived near and
frequented the Rialto Bridge.
The women from the first class of courtesan,
the honest courtesan, were often born into patrician or merchant family they
were raised as educated and cultured women. But in a society that dictated
exorbitant dowries that could often bankrupt a family, extra daughters were
often given no opportunity to marry. They could go into a convent and become a
nun, but that still required a dowry, though not as large. They could remain in
the household an ageing spinster tending to family member, forever dependent
and submissive perhaps to a new mistress of the household if it should pass to
a brother and his wife. Or circumstances, like poverty from funding a dowry to
an older sister, or failed commercial activities could encourage a young woman
to consider the life of a courtesan. Often, in these situations, a courtesan
could end up being the sole support of their family. 
Venetian Courtesan
Among the Venetian men generally,
courtesans were seen as cultured women who provided entertainment for wealthy
noblemen and merchants. In Venice, a man
wouldn’t be expected to marry until well into his thirties and courtesans could
provide these young men pleasure and culture and hopefully disease free. An
older man might take a courtesan as his mistress and enjoy a less inhibited
sexual experience than he would from a wife who had most likely been raised in
a convent-like atmosphere.
Successful courtesans could enjoy a
luxurious life filled with parties and salons. They often moved in influential
circles and had access to artists, poets, politicians and the thinkers of the
day. In such circles a courtesan had the opportunity to wield influence if she
was skilled enough to do so. Aside from the potential for power and influence
the honest courtesan still faced the possibility of contracting a sexually
transmitted disease, something that observed no class barriers.
One of the most celebrated and well known Venetian
courtesans was Veronica Franco, born in 1546. Born to the courtesan, Paola
Fracassa and the merchant, Francesco Franco she also had three brothers. Her intellectual life began with sharing her
brothers' education by private tutors in the family home and while still in her
teens she married the physician Paola Fracassa. Probably an arranged marriage,
it ended badly shortly afterwards and Veronica was forced to support herself.
Veronica Franco
Franco became a cortigiana onesta (honest
courtesan) in the mid to late 1560s and soon became famed for the intellectual
and culture entertainments she provided. She continued her education by
frequenting literary gatherings of writers and painters in Venice during the
1570s and 1580s and mingled with politicians, poets, artists and thinkers. She
captured the interest of Domenico Venier (1517-1582), a Venetian poet and the
head of the most renowned vernacular literary academy in Venice, who became her
reader and protector. A frequent visitor to his private literary salon at Ca'
Venier (the Venier palace), Franco composed sonnets and capitoli in terza rima
for exchange with male poets.
By her mid-twenties, Franco was requesting
sonnets for publication from male poets for anthologies that she assembled to
commemorate men of the Venetian elite. One such volume, the Rime di diversi
eccellentissimi autori nella morte dell'Illustre Sign. Estor Marteninengo Conte
di Malapaga, in honor of the Count Martinengo, was published in 1575; she was
not only the editor but also included nine sonnets she herself had written.
In 1575, during the epidemic of plague that
ravaged the city, Veronica Franco was forced to leave Venice and lost much of
her wealth when her house and possessions were looted. On her return in 1577,
she defended herself with dignity before the Inquisition on charges of
witchcraft (a common complaint lodged against courtesans in those days). The
charges were dropped. She died in 1591.
For more than four
hundred years, domestic manuals have done far more than offer women recipes and
guidelines for running a household. They have also served to construct and
reinforce gendered expectations of behaviour. A review of selected books of
household management shows how they underpinned and lauded a woman’s key function
in the domestic economy, whilst circumscribing roles and codes of behaviour
that conformed to the norms of a patriarchal society.
“Our English housewife must be of chaste
thought, stout courage, patient, untired, watchful, diligent, witty, pleasant,
constant in friendship. Full of good neighbourhood, wise in discourse, but not
frequent therein, sharp and quick of speech, but not bitter or talkative,
secret in her affairs, comfortable in her counsel, and generally skilful in all
the worthy knowledges which do belong to her vocation.”
This was, not surprisingly,
written by a man, Gervase Markham. His instructions and the tone is more
instructional than advisory, beginning with the need for the ‘good housewife’
to be ‘upright and severe in religion’. Whilst the man is unequivocally
the head of the household, the task of moral custodian is that of the women. Markham
then writes of the need for her garments to be, ‘altogether without toyish
garnishes, or the gloss of light colours, and as far from the vanity of new and
fantastic fashions, as near to the
comely imitations of modest matrons; ’ she is being told how to dress.
The essential ‘worthy knowledges’, that Markham refers to, include the ability to treat the household for a variety of medical conditions. Interestingly, this lengthy section comes before those relating to cookery, distilling and preserving. Markham’s seventeenth century housewife is also clearly expected to be proficient in all aspects of spinning, weaving and the production of clothing for the family, as well as dairying, brewing and baking. What is lacking from Markham’s work, is any coverage of cleaning, child-rearing, or the managing of servants. Is this because, as a man, he is focussed on the aspects of household routine that impinge most closely upon him. He expects to be fed, clothed and physicked by his wife but the servants and children are emphatically not part of his sphere.
For a female perspective, let us consider Hannah Woolley’s Compleat Serving Maid, first published in 1677. Although, Woolley writes as if she is the addressing potential servants themselves, at this time, the adult female literacy rate is thought to have been ten to fifteen percent and the vast majority of those women would not have been of the servant class. It is more likely therefore that her manual would have been read by the employers of servants, rather than those seeking the various roles that she describes. Here the tone is still instructional but somehow gentler than Markham’s diktats. Having outlined the precise duties of various grades of servant, Woolley briefly mentions the finer points of laundering and creating ‘beautify waters’, before turning to physick. She too prioritises this over the many tasks associated with feeding the family.
Her suggested menus, for different times of the year, are very far removed from those that working families might have been likely to afford. In her appendices, she address penmanship and ‘arithmetick’, before giving advice about how to identify the best produce at market. The early modern woman was required to master diverse, key skills like pharmacology, culinary expertise and household management. The housewife’s position as a key player in the domestic economy was legitimised and her specialist domestic knowledge and skills were valued.
Eliza Smith’s The Compleat Housewife or Accomplish’d Gentlewoman’s Companion, published in 1727, specifically addresses, as the title suggests, ‘accomplished gentlewomen’. This concentrates on recipes, rather than other aspects of the housewife’s role. In a similar vein, The Experienced English Housekeeper, published by Elizabeth Raffald some four decades later, provides advice on pickling cockles, making a porcupine of the flat ribs of beef and making tansy fritters. Raffald was the former housekeeper to an aristocratic family. By this time, literacy rates were increasing and it would be expected that an upper servant, such as a housekeeper, would be able to read. Although this tome runs to over four hundred pages it is devoted entirely to recipes, conventionally the role of the cook rather than the housekeeper. There is no advice on the traditional responsibilities of the housekeeper, such as managing servants.
In contrast, by the time Isabella Beeton was editing The English Woman’s Domestic Magazine in the 1850s and publishing her book of household management in 1861, the expectation was that women would be at the centre of domestic administration, commanding servants and tradesmen and overseeing the upbringing of the next generation. Mrs Beeton famously likened the mistress of the house to the ‘commander of an army’. Yet, this elevated status was accompanied by stricter behavioural constraints. The ideal perception of womanhood encompassed an inflexible etiquette and moral custodianship in a society that was uncompromisingly demarcated by social class.
Victorian values imposed a rigid strait-jacket for women striving for respectability and Mrs Beeton was there for the aspirational middle-class women, who were keen to reinforce their position in the social hierarchy. By providing women with the tools for successful household management and a blueprint for female agency and expertise, Mrs Beeton’s work might be regarded as elevating domesticity to a highly skilled, respected science. Yet, at the same time, that very agency became a vehicle for oppression, confining women to the restraining depiction of womanhood that was proscribed by the patriarchy.
Jane Ellen Panton published From Kitchen to Garret in 1895. In the aftermath of the industrial revolution, the forerunners of the conspicuous consumerism of the later twentieth century were apparent in embryonic form. Mrs Panton sets herself up as the moral arbiter of good taste as regards interior design and retail choices. Going from room to room, in the middle-class household, she defines what is necessary for good taste and refinement. Her emphasis is on creating and showcasing a home full of carefully curated possessions, chosen as much for their aesthetics as their practicality.
Interestingly, this volume is not specifically addressed to women and as the keeper of the purse strings, one would expect the man of the house to have had the final veto on which house to rent or buy and how it should be furnished. In fact, Panton addresses both ‘Edwin’ and ‘Angelina’ throughout. Nonetheless, women are clearly expected to have a subservient role, ‘women’s true work’, she says, ‘is that of a helper’. ‘Angelina’ is cautioned not to, ‘plunge head-first among the bread-winners with pen or pencil …… the profession of wife and mother being quite as much as any one woman can manage satisfactorily.’
By the nineteenth, century, many of the domestic tasks of the early modern housewife had been outsourced. The home was no longer a hub of productivity, textile work or medical care; instead, it was a stage on which the family’s middle-class status could be displayed. The broader economic responsibilities of the seventeenth century housewife had been eroded; gender roles were no longer different but equally valued, as they had been in the early modern era. Femininity was increasingly characterised by the consumer choices that she made.
These manuals and works like them, served to engineer and delineate women’s role in society. They reinforced patriarchal ideals, upheld a strictly gendered division of work and restricted women to the domestic sphere. As these books of household management illustrate, womanhood is concept that was constructed, not merely physiologically derived. From distilling herbal remedies in the seventeenth century to dithering over wallpaper choices two hundred years later, books of household advice allowed women to claim authority, expertise and an arena of their own, albeit one fashioned by men.
Wellcome Library https://archive.org/details/b20392
Image used under Creative Commons