Friday, 19 December 2025

Richard Dadd by Miranda Miller



 

   My seventh novel, The Fairy Visions of Richard Dadd, was first published by Peter Owen in 2013. Sadly, Peter Owen died in 2016 and I now own the rights of the four books of mine he published. This one is now out of print and my husband Gordon and I have decided to reprint it next summer to coincide with an exhibition of Richard Dadd’s work at the Royal Academy:Richard Dadd Beyond Bedlam 25 July - 25 October 2026. For nearly twenty years I’ve been fascinated by the tragic destiny of this man and by the remarkable work he produced, including  The Fairy Feller’s Masterstroke, the mysterious and compelling  painting on the cover of my novel.



Richard Dadd was born in 1817 in Chatham, in Kent. His father, Robert Dadd, was a chemist who lectured on Chemistry and Geology and was interested in both science and art. Richard was the fourth of seven children, four of whom were considered insane at the time of their death. When he was seven Richard’s mother died and his father remarried but his second wife also died, leaving two sons. As a widower with nine children Robert Dadd must have worried about money and about their future. Richard, in his early teens, showed signs of talent as an artist and it may have been because of his vicarious ambition for his son that in 1834, when Richard was 17, the family moved from Chatham to London. Robert Dadd bought a framing, gilding and bronzing business in Suffolk Street. After teaching himself to draw in the British Museum, Richard became a student at the Royal Academy schools, which had just moved from Somerset House to the very new National Gallery, a five minute walk from his family house. 


     As an art student at the prestigious Royal Academy Schools Richard was taught by Maclise, Etty, Landseer and Turner. He was considered exceptionally promising and won three silver medals, including one for the best life drawing. His closest friends were William Powell Frith and Augustus Egg, both of whom later had enormous success. 



                                                         Derby Day by William Powell Frith


    Frith’s paintings, Ramsgate Sands, The Railway Station and Derby Day were immensely popular as pictures of everyday life that were just sentimental enough to flatter the idea of themselves that middle class Victorians had. When they were first shown at the Royal Academy they attracted so many admirers that a railing had to to put up to keep the crowds back. In Derby Day, (1858), Richard Dadd appears in the crowd, wearing a fez. In my novel, which is set the previous year, Frith comes to visit Richard in the hospital. Augustus Egg’s most famous works, also painted in 1858, are three oil paintings called Past and Present, which show a woman who commits adultery and so falls from a state of married bliss, surrounded by her children, to become an outcast.This is the final painting. Didactic and moralistic, it appealed to Victorian taste. 

   In Tate Britain you can see Dadd’s The Fairy Feller’s Masterstroke, Frith’s Derby Day and  Egg’s Past and Present.  I think it’s very moving to imagine these three ambitious young art students in the 1840s, getting drunk together and criticising each other’s work, arguing furiously - and then, nearly two hundred years later, having their paintings hung in the same world famous gallery.


   Richard’s family couldn’t support him and when he finished his art course he had to struggle to survive. He was interested in imaginative art and was already painting fairies, and although he managed to get various commissions, then,as now, it was very hard to earn a living as an artist.  He never would have been able to afford any kind of grand tour by himself but a Welsh solicitor, Sir Thomas Phillips, who had just been knighted by Queen Victoria for shooting Chartists, invited Richard to accompany him as his pet artist. Twenty years later, of course, Phillips would have taken a camera. In July 1842 the two men set out on a ten month journey to Italy, Greece, Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Palestine and Egypt. Here’s a drawing Richard did of his patron, all dressed up in traditional Arab robes.


      As Richard comments in my novel, Phillips looks more like a wet night in Pontypool than an Arabian one. This journey must have been fascinating, exhausting and confusing. Writing home to Frith, Richard said that when he lay down at the end of the day his imagination was “so full of wild vagaries that I have really and truly doubted of my own sanity.” He probably smoked hashish and it is now known that drugs can trigger schizophrenic episodes in vulnerable young people. Richard imagined that he was being persecuted by evil spirits who took on various forms: a sea captain, an old lady in the Vatican galleries in Rome and Phillips himself, and he became obsessed by the idea that he was a ‘catspaw’ of the Egyptian god Osiris. When they reached Paris, on the way home, Phillips wanted him to see a doctor but at the end of May 1843 Richard fled back to London.

   That summer Richard’s behaviour became increasingly strange and paranoid. His friends and family were naturally very worried about him and his landlady was terrified of him. Richard’s father, Robert, insisted that his son was suffering from sunstroke and needed rest and quiet. Soon after Richard’s twenty-sixth birthday, Robert Dadd took him to see Dr Alexander Sutherland, a famous ‘mad doctor’ at St Luke’s Hospital in Old Street, who told him that his son was very ill and should stay in the hospital. 


   Despite this Robert Dadd was convinced that he knew his son better than anyone else and that a trip to the country would help. Father and son set off together for Cobham, in Kent, to revisit the area where Richard had grown up. That night they went for a walk in the grounds of Cobham Park, where Richard stabbed and killed his father. 


   It was one of the most sensational Victorian murders. Richard had brought a spring knife, passport and money to Cobham with him, so the murder was clearly premeditated. After killing his father Richard fled abroad. He later told a doctor he was on his way to assassinate the Emperor of Austria and was soon arrested after he tried to cut the throat of a fellow passenger in a carriage in France. Eventually he was extradited and in August 1844 was confined for life to the criminal lunatic department of the Bethlem hospital, or Bedlam, which was in the building that is now the Imperial War Museum. 




                                                                        Dr Charles Hood


   The most impressive thing about those long years of incarceration is that they were not lost; Richard continued to draw and paint. When I was researching this novel, I expected to find that patients in a mental hospital in the 1850s were treated abominably but, when I visited the Bethlem archives at Eden Park in Kent, I discovered  that in 1853 a new young Resident Physician, Dr Charles Hood, was appointed. He carried out a number of reforms after a public scandal about the way the inmates were mistreated. Dr Hood abolished chains and other mechanical restraints and tried to make the wards comfortable. In 1857, the year my novel is set, an article in Household Words, the magazine Dickens edited, described a visit to the hospital and concluded hat “thousands of middle class homes contain nothing so pretty as a ward in Bedlam,” and that, “as to all the small comforts of life, patients in Bethlehem are as much at liberty to make provision for themselves as they would be at home”. Dr Hood removed bars from the windows and introduced aviaries, pets, plants and pictures to the wards. Keepers were given training and became more like nurses and patients were encouraged to occupy and entertain themselves.


   All the time I was writing about Richard Dadd this photograph of him haunted me and I looked at it constantly.

 

    It was taken in about 1857, the year my novel is set, and shows Dadd, aged 40, in the hospital at his easel, where the unfinished oval of Contradiction: Oberon and Titania (another of his fairy paintings) sits, waiting for the brush he holds to continue to bring it to life. He stares at the camera, at us, with recognition and warmth, looking more like an artist in his studio than a prisoner in his cell. 


   In fact, 1857 was the year when Dadd was moved from the grim, Home Office block at the back of the hospital, where the criminal lunatics were housed, to the main part of the hospital, where he was given a spacious room to paint in. He went, quite literally, from darkness to light and this resulted in his best work, although he had heroically carried on painting and drawing even during the thirteen years when he was incarcerated in the overcrowded and dungeon- like conditions of the criminal lunatic block. The doctors in the hospital encouraged and even collected his work. In 1863 he was transferred to the new Broadmoor hospital in Berkshire, where he remained until his death in 1886.




                                                      www.mirandamiller.info



Friday, 12 December 2025

IF IT'S CHRISTMAS IT MUST BE WINDSOR By Elizabeth Chadwick

 In the course of my research, I often have to know (if possible to know) where a particular English monarch was spending Christmas.  This has led me to a few other posts on the history girls regarding the festive whereabouts of King Henry I, his grandson King Henry II and his great grandson King John.  Henry I's  whereabouts are here. If it's Christmas it must be Westminster   For Henry II go here If it's Christmas it must be Chinon  and King John is here.  King John's Christmas Eve

I continue the tradition now with their many times descendent Edward III, scion of the fourteenth century, and his whereabouts at this time of year, if known.   Some such as Windsor were common to all, but many had different preferences, or itinerant residences.  Windsor itself seems to have been a particular favourite of Edward III when not engaged in warfare or travelling for business. 

King Edward III grants Aquitaine to his son Prince Edward Initial letter "E" of miniature, 1390

Lets have a look from 1327 onwards. 


1327 Edward was at Worcester

1328  Edward was again at Worcester 

1329  Kenilworth was the venue for all of December as it had been in November.  He finally moved on to Alcester on January 3rd. 

1

ruins of Kenilworth Castle.  Photo Rosemary Watson

330 Kingston Upon Thames

1331 Wells

1332 Now in Yorkshire at Beverley

1333 Wallingford

1334  Back up north at Roxburgh

1335 Newcastle On Tyne

1336 Hatfield, Yorkshire

1337 Guildford

1338 Abroad now in Antwerp where his second son Lionel was born

1339 Antwerp again

1340 Reading

1341 Melrose and Roxburgh

1342 Vannes

1343 Woodstock - a favourite pleasure palace of the Angevin kings and still in frequent favour

Print of Woodstock palace, demolished in the 18th Century 
to make way for Blenheim Palace. 


1344 Norwich

1345 Woodstock again 

1346 Across the Channel in Calais which was under English rule and control

1347 Guildford for the second time.  He'd been here 10 years ago in 1337

1348  Oxford - a one and only.  This was the year that the Black Death came to England.

1349 Havering atte Bowere

1350  Ludgershall 

1351 St Albans followed by Woodstock the next day

1352 St Albans again

1353 Eltham

1354 Hampstead Marshall - in an earlier century the home of the great William Marshal

1355  Newcastle on Tyne.  Last previous visit was in 1335, 20 years earlier

1356  Eltham

1357 Marlborough

1358 Havering atte Bowere - a favourite residence of his wife Queen Philippa of Hainault

1359 Abroad at Verzy

1360 Woodstock again.  From here on in, King Edward holds Christmas in the Home Counties within a shortish distance of London.

1361 Windsor.  Now we begin a consecutive run.

1362 Windsor

Modern Windsor Castle: author's personal photo collection

1363 Windsor

1364 Windsor

1365 Windsor

1366 Windsor

1367 Eltham

1368 Windsor

1369 King's Langley  - Queen Philippa died in the autumn of this year. 

1370 Sheen or King's Langley

1371 Eltham

1372 Eltham

1373 Woodstock

1374 King's Langley or Sheen

1375 King's Langley

1376 Havering atte Bowere

Tomb effigy of Edward III: Web Gallery of Art

Elizabeth Chadwick is a million selling author of historical fiction.  Her latest novels cover the life and times of Joan of Kent in The Royal Rebel and The Crownless Queen.  She is currently writing a novel about Katherine Swynford and her relationships with her husbands Hugh Swynford and John of Gaunt. 

.





Friday, 5 December 2025

Dickens and the Ghost at Rockingham Castle by Judith Allnatt


In the summer I visited Rockingham Castle in Northamptonshire and was fascinated to learn that it was a source of inspiration for Charles Dickens. In particular, he drew on its ancient rooms and the story of its resident ghost in his novel Bleak House, a work of Gothic fiction and a satirical treatment of the English legal system. Its plot concerns the long running probate case of Jarndyce and Jarndyce in which, by the time it is brought to conclusion, the lawyers' fees have actually used up all of the money in the estate.  Rockingham Castle, was the inspiration for Chesney Wold, home of Lord and Lady Dedlock in Bleak House. 

 


In a letter, Dickens described Rockingham as “a large old castle, approached by an ancient keep, portcullis, etc., filled with company waited on by six-and-twenty servants” and his time spent visiting as “the dear old Rockingham days.”



Dickens first met the owners of Rockingham Castle, Richard and Lavinia Watson, in 1846 on holiday in Switzerland, discovering shared interests in Liberal principles, art and theatricals. It seems to have been a lively and joyous friendship with reference made in letters to playing Tricks, Charades and Battledore  (similar to badminton). 


When staying at Rockingham he put on plays in the Great Hall  and wrote with gratification of ‘all the household headed by an enormously fat housekeeper occupying the back benches . . . laughing and applauding without restraint.’ On occasion the plays were followed by dancing until three in the morning.



When Richard died at the age of only fifty two, Dickens was shocked and saddened. He wrote to Lavinia “We held him so close in our hearts ... and we have been so happy with him”. He and Lavinia continued to be lifelong friends and correspondents.

 Dickens had a favourite room at Rockingham, on the first floor looking out along the gap between two yew ‘cloud hedges’. 


These enormous topiary creations are known as the Elephant Hedge and are cut to resemble elephants following each other, trunk to tail.  Looking out of his window Dickens claimed to have seen a ghost and the story attached to it caught his imagination.

 

In the Civil War, Sir Lewis Watson was a royalist but his wife espoused the cause of the parliamentarians. In Sir Lewis Watson’s absence, the parliamentarians conquered Rockingham and, so the guide told me, it was thought to be a bit too easy. In Bleak House, Sir Morbury Dedlock thinks that his wife is laming their stabled horses to stop the royalists being able to make use of them and in a physical struggle with her she falls and injures her hip. 


Dickens continues the story thus: 

She had been a lady of a handsome figure and a noble carriage. She never complained of the change; she never spoke to anyone of being crippled or of being in pain but day by day she tried to walk upon the terrace, and with the help of the stone balustrade, went up and down, up and down, up and down, in sun and shadow, with greater difficulty every day. At last one afternoon her husband (to whom she had never on any persuasion, opened her lips since that night), standing at the great south window, saw her drop upon the pavement. He hastened down to raise her, but she repulsed him as he bent over her, and looking at him fixedly and coldly, said ‘I will die here where I have walked. And I will walk here though I am in my grave. I will walk here until the pride of this house is humbled. And when calamity or when disgrace is coming to it, let the Dedlocks listen for my step!’ Bleak House, Charles Dickens.


The character that Dickens uses to tell this story is Mrs Rouncewell, who has been housekeeper for fifty years and  who is reminiscent of the ‘enormously fat housekeeper’ referred to in his letter. On my visit, the tradition of both housekeepers and ghosts was apparent in the comment of the guide to the grounds. She said that she and others had heard the sound of children playing when none were in the castle and that on one occasion when the housekeeper was hoovering, a back door had flown open and the plug was pulled out, as if snatched by an unseen hand! 

 

When being shown around the Long Gallery, I also learned that Dickens had a favourite chair, which is still there in the same position.  I pictured Dickens ensconced in this wing-backed leather chair, musing or writing, taking breaks to gaze down the length of the long room at theItalian glass chandeliers, low hanging and tipped with pink flowers, the red drapes hanging heavy and the busy gold and green wallpaper providing the rich, ornamented interior so typical of grand Victorian taste. Perhaps he would have imagined the shades of ladies past, making their promenade up and down the room, as was their wont when the weather outside was inclement. 

 

This idea of musing makes me think of the famous painting of Dickens  imagining his characters.



The painting, Dickens’ Dream by Robert William Buss, consists of a combination of painted and sketched characters because it was unfinished. However, when standing in front of it, I can’t help seeing it as a visual representation of the creative process of writing – the development of characters first as having the shady outlines of a ghost then filling out with life and colour as the author actually puts pen to paper and the story, drawing inspiration from a multitude of interesting fragments of experience begins to take shape. Rockingham is rich in such fragments and it’s no surprise that its people, atmosphere and legends lodged with Dickens and fed his remarkable creativity.

For those interested in finding out more, Rockingham Castle has lots of Dickens memorabilia  and the castle’s own long history is also fascinating.  https://rockinghamcastle.com

Acknowledgements: My thanks to David Shipton, Head Guide, Rockingham Castle for his excellent pamphlet ‘A Short Account of Charles Dickens, the Watsons and Rockingham Castle’, which is available from the castle, and to Mike Burton and the grounds guides for their help and informative comments.

 


Friday, 28 November 2025

How much history does it take? Cruise ships in the heart of London - Michelle Lovric


For a few weeks in March this year, I culturally appropriated the life of Someone in the City.

I rose at 4am to prepare texts for cross-examinations. I dressed in unaccustomed structured garments with buttons and zips. I galloped up to London Bridge in flat heels to catch a suffocating bus and trotted through swarming streets to an expensive building where I changed to high(ish) heels. One day, I even bought coffee in a takeaway paper cup. Then I descended to a basement in the City of London for a long day of interrogation and legal argument.

While this was a strange new world for me, it wasn’t research for a novel. I was taking part in a Public Inquiry into the proposed Harbour Revision Order (HRO) of the Port of London Authority (PLA). An HRO is a way by which the PLA can change their governing Act without actually going to Parliament. In short, the PLA has been seeking to increase its powers. A number of Thames organisations are strongly opposed to this, and some (including my own) were shocked at the near absence of any provisions, within the proposed changes, to address the climate crisis and rising sea levels.

I won’t pretend that a Public Inquiry isn’t an intimidating process or that it was easy to understand and then learn the rules of engagement. For example, I was not allowed to speak myself but could script speeches for others.

I won’t pretend that I didn’t make mistakes.

But I did attend every single day. I also wrote every day – probably 100,000 words all together in just a couple of months, including the original submissions and the extended Proofs of Evidence. No, it wasn’t a novel, and it certainly wasn’t poetry. But it was all writing, whether detailed cross-examination questions, speaking notes or press releases. One of my pieces caused a colleague to break down mid-sentence, so it wasn’t all dry, legal stuff either.

In fact, all we had were words, which is why this blog is not illustrated - to give a flavour of such intense proceedings conducted almost entirely without pictures or video. Despite large screens in the room, with very few exceptions, the objectors were not permitted to show photos or film of, for example, cormorants wounded by violent wash from speeding Clippers. We couldn't show cruise ship fumes or risky RIB manoeuvres. 

But, as we writers know, it is amazing what you can do with words alone. 

For a very good, succinct overview of the Inquiry, I recommend this piece by Dr Hilary Pereira of the River Thames Society, a fellow-objector. 

My own environmental group is called the River Residents Group (RRG). To the Public Inquiry, the RRG brought a number of issues, some of which have been covered in the press to which I’ll link to at the bottom of this post. The story the press loved most was the one about the enormous charges that the PLA lays on some balcony-owners and the aggression with which the Authority pursues the money. Another was the secrecy and unaccountability of the PLA’s process for granting ‘River Works Licences’, operating as both landlord and Planning authority for the river bed. (‘That’s Uzbekistan!’ former MP Sir Simon Hughes commented in his testimony, in which he called for the PLA’s multiple and sometimes conflicting powers to be disaggregated.) 

Other objectors questioned the way the PLA spends what it calls ‘Stakeholder benefit’ mostly on its own staff and pensions, while the rest of its stakeholders receive very little.

Many important matters were aired. Other issues, however, were evaded by the officers whom the PLA chose to represent their interests at the hearing. The CEO and Chair did not appear.

One issue that was regrettably sidestepped was the RRG’s concern about the increasing number of cruise ships coming into the heart of London, including some of those rated as the dirtiest and least transparent in the world by the Friends of the Earth, which produces an annual report card on the leading companies. The cruise ships moor opposite the Tower of London alongside HMS Belfast and at Greenwich, surrounded by thousands of residents. Air pollution is one worry but there is also the risk of accidents.

The PLA has outsourced the management of central London’s cruise ship arrivals to a consortium that includes the owners of the Thames Clippers. Many cruise vessels are registered in Panama or the Bahamas by Liberian-owned companies, adding to the complexity of what might ensue, should there be a major cruise ship accident in the centre of London. This has always worried us.

For the Public Inquiry, we created a scenario intended to stress-test the PLA’s provisions for such an incident. This was a hypothetical scenario. But each individual event within it drew on an incident that had really happened somewhere, including on the Thames. All we did is combine them in what we understand is a normal process in risk assessment. In the event, we were not permitted to ventilate the full scenario in the Public Inquiry and instead eked out just a colourless paragraph about it as the basis of questions that were in the end passed down the line from one PLA witness to another until time was up – leaving the RRG even more concerned than we were before the Public Inquiry.

I feel that our scenario deserves to be out there. It is a serious document, checked by a member of the Honourable Company of Master Mariners to ensure it was ship-shape. So I am confident of our tech. And very confident of our history. So I thought I’d bring the scenario to this blog, where history is always welcome.

Here is our scenario.

Let’s say the PLA has given the Starburst Celebrity cruise ship a Passage Plan into central London. The Starburst Celebrity does not exist, but ships of similar sizes have been allowed into central London. 

In this scenario, the Starburst Celebrity’s on her way to her berth alongside HMS Belfast, just west of Tower Bridge.

Now this is the stretch of the Thames named as the most dangerous for collisions in London – in a 2016 report commissioned by the PLA and Transport for London (TfL).

The "Assessment of Vessel Traffic Capacity on the River Thames in Central London" states “The Thames Traffic Model was refined and adapted to also calculate collision risk for vessels navigating in Central London. The Level of Safety was measured by estimating the probability of a major incident occurring using the model …The greatest risk is determined to be adjacent to Tower Pier and HMS Belfast where vessels berthing at Tower Pier encounter vessels transiting past the pier – through traffic.” 

In its conclusions, the Assessment states, “The impact of mooring cruise ships at HMS Belfast was analysed and shown to increase the likelihood of a collision adjacent to Tower Pier by between 15% and 30%, which equates to approximately 5% across the whole study area. Half of this increase is associated with transfer vessels between the cruise ship and Tower Pier.

It really could not be much clearer, could it? 

Nevertheless, the PLA has continued to allow increasing numbers of cruise ships to come in to this area. And no follow-up report was commissioned, as we have verified. 

Let’s say the Starburst Celebrity is 16,800 tonnes, 176m long and 22m wide. Let's say she has 518 passengers and crew.

The Starburst Celebrity’s arriving with tugs fore and aft, and at a slow-to-moderate safe speed adapted to the prevailing circumstances and conditions. She has her SAFE RETURN TO PORT document that shows trials have examined risks, failures and ways of dealing with them.

That means that problems are unlikely but not impossible.

Vessel problems can come from mechanical failure and human error. It’s an accumulation of things, sometimes small things individually, that can suddenly escalate into a dangerous situation.

As I've said, all of what I’m about to describe has happened, some of it on the Thames.

In our scenario, somewhere past Tilbury the Starburst Celebrity has suffered a failure on the main electrical switchboard that breaks the connection between the power supply to the engine and steering controls on the bridge. The emergency back-up runs on a battery that’s depleting fast. Alarms are sounding and flashing, but the crew are suffering from the known syndrome of 'alarm overload'. This is, by the way, exactly what happened with the MSC Opera in Venice in June 2019. None of the crew on the Opera’s bridge – or in the engine room – noticed the alarms until it was too late to prevent the 60,000-tonne vessel crashing into a river cruiser and the Zattere embankment, injuring six and causing millions in damage.

Back in London … Just as the Starburst Celebrity reaches Tower Bridge, the emergency system’s back-up batteries run out. The Starburst Celebrity experiences an uncontrolled power surge, something like what apparently happened when the Oceandiva allided with a stationary barge at Erith in June 2023.

The Starburst Celebrity’s tugs – like the tugs of the MSC Opera in Venice – are unable to stop her in time. The Starburst Celebrity veers under Tower Bridge, across the Thames and allides with Tower Millennium Pier.

On the way, she runs down her own fore tug and the battery-hybrid Earth Clipper that is waiting at the Pier.

As she passes it, the Starburst Celebrity also clips Tower Bridge, damaging the bridge’s structure – as happened when HMS Jupiter crashed into London Bridge in 1984 … or as happened in Baltimore in March 2024 when the container ship Dali clipped one of the tiers of the Francis Scott Key Bridge. In that case, the whole bridge came down, and there were fatalities.

Even at low speed, the impact with Tower Bridge has opened a 5-metre gash in the cruise ship’s starboard hull. The Starburst Celebrity does polar cruises so she’s “Ice Class”, meaning a stronger hull. But she was built in 1993 and doesn’t need to conform with post 2010 rules for bunker tanks within secondary hulls. So the gash ruptures a full tank of fuel.

Cruise ships are not like cargo ships in that they still have very significant power requirements even when alongside (moored up). This is because they run as hotels 24 hours a day. That takes a lot of fuel. Potentially, a single bunker tank on the Starburst Celebrity could hold 100,000 gallons or even up to 250,000 gallons of heavy fuel oil or – best case – gas oil with a bit less sulphur. The tide immediately spreads the spill upstream and will then bring it back downstream in a few hours.

The Friends of the Earth 2024 Cruise Ship Report Card rates the (notional) Starburst fleet (the Celebrity's parent company) as F when it comes to both transparency and scrubber use. Open loop scrubbers allow ships to use high sulphur fuels by rinsing exhaust into sea, in other words converting their air pollution into water pollution.

On November 1 2023, a power outage on the cruise ship Carnival Magic caused a scrubber sludge dump inside Grand Turk port waters.

Starburst isn't telling, so we don’t know what kind of scrubber system the Starburst Celebrity uses. Maybe she is one of the rare cruise ships that hasn't chosen the cheaper scrubber solution over the environment ... maybe she has no scrubbers at all and uses better fuel. But potentially, if there are scrubbers, the accident also releases into the Thames half a million litres of hot sooty scrubber wash, containing acids, carcinogenic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, heavy metals and black carbon.

Water has rushed into one of the watertight compartments via the gash in the hull, causing the Starburst Celebrity to list 5% starboard. Unfortunately that pins the damaged Earth Clipper beneath her, like the Bowbelle pinned down the Marchioness party boat just down the Thames near Southwark Bridge in 1989.

So both vessels, the cruise ship and the Clipper, are wedged diagonally in the mud between HMS Belfast and Tower Millennium Pier.

Water entering the Earth Clipper reaches the power banks, compromising the Lithium-ion batteries. Escaping gases deflagrate and there’s an explosion, as seems to have happened on July 25 2022 aboard the river cruise ship the Viking Gymir in Amsterdam.

But this is summer in the heart of London, and there are thousands of people nearby. A toxic vapour cloud engulfs 50 people dining outside at Club Coppa, 500 visitors inside the Tower of London, the residents inside the165 apartments in Sugar Quay, 200 people picnicking in Potters Field, as well as patients and staff at London Bridge Hospital on the south side of the river. It doesn’t spare the people in office buildings north and south – latest estimates are that 625,000 work in the City.

Because of the vapour cloud, soon buildings up to 200 metres inland will need to be evacuated.

Fish, birds and seals are poisoned by the diesel spill and the scrubber wash, some dying immediately. Others will die slowly as the diesel corrodes their internal organs.

The Starburst Celebrity and Earth Clipper are stuck, a 176m obstacle blocking the Thames. It took three years to raise and drag away the wreck of the cruise ship Costa Concordia after its allision with rocks off the Isola di Giglio in January 2012. The Dali blocked the harbour in Baltimore for nearly three months. The economic impact was estimated at $15 million per day. How long would the Starburst Celebrity split the Thames in two? In that time, waste could not leave the city on the Cory tug and tows. Nothing could get past into the city either.

But the crash has only just happened. People have died on the cruise ship, on Tower Millennium Pier and some are being suffocated by the vapour cloud.

There are people in the water, choking on diesel, being dragged down by the current. The RNLI lifeboats are scrambled but are unable to deal with the number of people in the river.

That’s not all.

We’re not saying that it is, but what if the Starburst Celebrity were one of the cruise ships equipped with ‘magic pipes’ that allow oil-contaminated waste water to be secretly discharged against environmental regulations? If it were, survivors in the river would also be gulping on that.

If you think that this could never happen - hundreds died in raw sewage on the Thames in 1878 when the Princess Alice pleasure steamer went down after a collision.

Back in today’s world, the Starburst Celebrity has destabilized Tower Bridge’s northern shaft. The bridge is declared unsafe. Traffic is gridlocked down to Chelsea on the north side and backing up to Peckham on the south side. Nothing can get across Tower Bridge and the remaining bridges are soon blocked. Emergency services are overwhelmed and many cannot get to the site.

I know it sounds like a rather bad Hollywood disaster movie and I know that this should never happen. But I need to keep reminding the reader that, separately, all of these things have happened, some them not far from my desk.

One final factor, the Starburst Celebrity, like so many cruise ships, is registered in the Bahamas. Starburst Cruises, which owns the vessel, is a fully-owned subsidiary of another household name Group which is incorporated in Liberia.

We know that ships are required to have

- Hull & Machinery insurance to cover sinking,

- Protection and Indemnity insurance for injuries and damage

- Wreck Removal Liability

- Bunker Pollution insurance

But the incident would stress-test the most well-prepared of organisations. And at this point, everything is urgent and lives depend on speed.

For the Public Inquiry, we had prepared fourteen questions about how long it would take to remove a wrecked cruise ship from the Thames, who would be liable for the damage, who would take overall financial responsibility, whether a desktop exercise was done annually to manage the risk of a cruise-sized major pollution incident at Greenwich or the Tower of London with loss of life and effect on London’s infrastructure? We wanted to know if the PLA invests in live exercises for a climate/pollution or collision disaster? We wanted to know if the PLA was planning to dredge the estuary and river to allow even bigger cruise ships to come to Tilbury.

Most of all, given their own report showing cruise ships increased the likelihood of a collision adjacent to Tower Pier by between 15% and 30%, we wanted to asked why the PLA still gives these vessels Passage Plans to the same site.

All those questions remain unasked (except here) and unanswered.

And the very day I drafted this blog, a large three-masted Mexican training ship, the Cuauhtémoc, lost power and crashed into Brooklyn Bridge, resulting in two fatalities.

This seems the place to pause and ask ... 

How much history does it take to make a difference to the future?

At the date this blog is published, we're still waiting for the Inspector's conclusions from the Public Inquiry. They are due next month. There are three possible results: that the HRO should be scrapped, that it should be passed as the PLA wishes or that amendments should be made. We understand that we objectors will be consulted in the third case. 

In the time between the Public Inquiry and now, my writing life has changed. There's a publisher and publication date in sight for The Puffin, the long-gestated sequel to my novel The Book of Human SkinI have an inspiring agent who loves the book and a publisher who is a poet. The Puffin is teaching me how not to be afraid of Instagram

I still spend a great deal of time writing about the Thames and the Venetian lagoon, not as a novelist but as a campaigner for NoGrandiNavi and the River Residents Group (Join us! it's free and you don't have to live on the Thames; you just have to care about it). We're all interested in commodification of liquid public realms and in legal personhood for bodies of water that have not been protected by those charged to keep them safe. The comradeship is wonderful. The learning never stops.

But I admit that it's good to feel like a novelist again and to wake up thinking my characters' thoughts. 

Michelle Lovric's website.


Thursday, 20 November 2025

The Nuclear Option: Love Spells and Curses in the Ancient World by Elisabeth Storrs

Popular culture is rife with examples of humankind’s fascination with magic whether malicious or benevolent. Buffy the Vampire Slayer was a world-wide phenomenon which spawned countless TV series with fantastical elements. The Harry Potter books continue to introduce new generations of kids to the realm of wizards. Harry and his friends are schooled in the three unforgiveable curses: the Cruciatus Curse which causes the victim excruciating pain, the Imperius Curse which makes the victim totally obedient to the caster, and the Killing Curse, which instantly kills the victim.

These three dark charms are reminiscent of the types of curses levelled in Greco-Roman times. The practice of ‘Defixio’ involved using a ‘curse tablet’ Tabella Defixionis (Roman) or Katadesmos (Greek) to damn a victim or cast a love spell on a subject of desire. The tablets consisted of thin pieces of lead sheet upon which script was scratched. Often the defixiones were then folded, rolled or pierced with nails to contain the incantation. To empower them, you needed to place them underground. Many were buried in graves and tombs, thrown into wells or cisterns, or nailed to the walls of temples of Chthonic deities such as Demeter and Persephone. The fact so many examples of these tablets exist is due to the fact placing a lead tablet in the ground preserves it.

Defixio is derived from the word for ‘to pierce’ or ‘to bind’. The tablets were used to ask the gods to bind a victim to an act that either condemned them to misfortune or compelled them to do something against their will. These invocations fell into various categories such as hindering a competitor, thwarting an opposing litigant in a court case, or forcing someone to fall passionately in love or punish their unfaithfulness. There was also the extreme option of seeking your enemy’s torture, death and the downfall of their family line!

Here is an example of vicious curse against a competitor. ‘I implore you, spirit, whoever you are, and I command you to torment and kill the horses of the green and white teams from this hour on, from this day on, and to kill Clarus, Felix, Primulus, and Romanus, the charioteers.’ Tunisia C3rd CE

This imprecation is less malevolent, seeking a comedian’s routine to fall flat: ‘Sosio must never do better than the mime Eumolpos. He must not be able to play the role of a married woman in a fit of drunkenness on a young horse.’ Rauranum in western France C3rd CE.

The first examples of defixiones were discovered in the city of Selinus in Sicily. The majority of the twenty-two tablets were concerned with court cases. There are also examples of small effigies, sometimes referred to loosely as Voodoo dolls. Three such dolls were found in Athens at around the end of the C5th BCE. Each figurine lies within a casket with their hands lashed behind their back and their feet tied together. The curse scored into the casket implores the gods to bind the victim so they will perform poorly in court. The elaborate nature of these defixiones suggests the hand of a professional magician (paid by a wealthy client) compared to the more common DIY lead sheets found in their thousands in Athens.

Christopher A. Faraone, professor of classical languages and literature at the University of Chicago, posits there were an extraordinary number of curse tablets found in late Classical Athens because lead was a convenient by-product of the silver mines that contributed to the wealth of that city. As such, lead was a very cheap and reusable medium useful for business communications. After the silver mines were exhausted, however, the stockpile of lead was soon depleted. Curses were then written on wax and papyrus which did not survive burial underground.

Erotic curses could be adjusted for different situations such a ‘separation’ spell (known as a ‘Diakopai’) to drive away rivals by making them hideous to the subject of unrequited affection. An ‘Agogai’ curse sought to bind the person to the caster. Some were passion-inducing while others sought only to encourage affection. One example of a milder spell is ‘Bind Helen, so that she is unsuccessful when she flirts or makes love with Demetrius.’ In comparison, this incantation wishes harm on a rival and implies the lover could have been either male or female: ‘May he who carried off Vilbia from me become as liquid as water. (May) she who obscenely devoured her (become) dumb, whether Velvinna, Exsupereus, Verianus, Severinus, A(u)gustalis, Comitianus, Catus, Minianus, Germanilla (or) Jovina.’ (Aquae Sulis)

The use of magic in Classical Athens does not appear to be illegal. Athenians would most likely have seen it as a chthonic religious ritual connected with those gods who lived in the ground and were very closely connected with ghosts and the dead. The Ancient Romans were not so tolerant. Under the Law of the Twelve Tables (the first codified set of laws established in 451 BCE), the use of incantations to cause dishonour or disgrace attracted capital punishment. However, clearly the threat of death was insufficient to deter the use of defixiones given the number of curse tablets found across the Roman world over the centuries.

Defixiones seeking justice were useful where a crime was senseless and the perpetrator unknown to the victim. A number of curse tablets were discovered in digs in Roman Britain. One trove of 130 defixiones is known as the Bath Curse Tablets found at the site of Aquae Sulis. All bar one sought restitution of goods (evidently theft was rife in bathhouses).

Here’s an example of a bathhouse curse: ‘Docimedis has lost two gloves and asks that the thief responsible should lose their minds and eyes in the goddess’s temple.’ Somerset 2nd -4th CE

And here is a nuclear option. ‘The human who stole Verio’s cloak or his things, who deprived him of his property, may he be bereft of his mind and memory, be it a woman or those who deprived Verio of his property, may the worms, cancer, and maggots penetrate his hands, head, feet, as well as his limbs and marrows.’ Frankfurt C1st CE

By the end of the Hellenistic period (circa 323 BCE), magical handbooks began to appear which continued to be used into Roman Imperial times which provide evidence magical practices were done by professionals. Different languages were used, and different gods were implored, including the Jewish Yahweh or the Egyptian gods. The increasing commerciality of the Defixio practice is evident given tablets could be prepared in advance, with a space left for a customer to insert the name of their victim.

'Bind the tongue and the thoughts of ____________, who is about to testify against me.'

Interestingly, the playwrights of Ancient Roman and Greek literature attribute the primary use of magic to women, but archaeological evidence shows men to be the principal practitioners. In a series of over 400 tablets found in Roman Britain, over two-thirds of those inscribing the curse/spell were males.

Learning about curse tablets inspired me to create two of my own as a major plot device in the A Tale of Ancient Rome series. In The Golden Dice, a soldier risks capital punishment by not only damning his rival to a grisly fate but also inscribing an enchantment to entice his lost love to return by ‘hammer [ing] both desire and curse into the brickwork with one long iron nail—to remain there forever potent and terrible, guarded by ghosts.’ If you want to know whether such defixiones were successful, you’ll need to read the trilogy.

Elisabeth Storrs is the author of the A Tale of Ancient Rome series. Now she is obsessed with twisted Germanic history with her upcoming release, Fables & Lies, set in WW2 Berlin. Learn more at www.elisabethstorrs.com

Image Sources: Wikimedia Commons as follows: 

-Magic curse written on a lead figurine in a lead box, found in the enclosure of Aristion, and dating 420-410 BCE Kerameikos Archaeological Museum (Athens). Photographer Giovanni Dall'Orto.

-Roman Curse Tablet, North Lincolnshire Museum. Photographer Martin Forema.

-Ancient roman lead tablet inscribed with a curse from the Baths of Diocletian in Rome – Photographer Bari' bin Farangi.

-Roman lead curse tablet Kent County Council. Photographer Andrew Richardson.

-Well in which lead scroll fragments were intentionally thrown for magical practices. C4th CE Israel. Photographer Mikey641.