Showing posts with label Susan Price. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Susan Price. Show all posts

Friday, 20 March 2026

“Read the Falco Books.” by Susan Price

 


My good friend, Karen Bush, gave me this advice at regular intervals:

“Read the Falco books.”

 

Karen, excellent editor and avid reader, put me onto many great reads: most notably the ‘Song of Fire and Ice’ sequence by George R. R. Martin, and the wonderful ‘Six Duchies’ books of Robin Hobb. Also, Hobb’s lesser-known, but excellent ‘Soldier Son’ trilogy.

 

Karen and I often exchanged notes about what we were reading (both of us were always reading something) and then she’d demand, “Have you read the Falco books yet?  No?— Well, read them.”

Karen had regularly proved that she knew a good book when she met it, but still, I never got around to Falco. 

 

I think I’d got it into my head that they were an Ancient Roman version of the Brother Cadfael series: that is, ‘murder-mysteries’ set in the past, with an historically accurate background and a main character ingeniously solving crimes without any modern forensic aids. 


But, back off, Cadfael fans! I do not intend, by this, any criticism of the Cadfael books. I’ve enjoyed reading most, quite possibly all, of them. But then, I’ve always been interested in what might be loosely called ‘the medieval period.’ I didn’t have  - then - any equivalent interest in Ancient Rome, and so the idea of ‘a Roman Cadfael’ didn’t much appeal.  

Then, very suddenly, unbelievably, Karen died. And I miss her. It seemed important to read the Falco books.

As usual, Karen was absolutely right. They are cracking reads that I should have fallen headlong into years ago. There are twenty books in the series. Twenty books! Twenty books worth of page-turning and staying awake into the small hours to read the next bit. And the next bit. And the next chapter…Or two...

Karen and I could have had our own Falco book-club, as we did a Pratchett book-club. What a fool I was, not to have immediately jumped to it and read Falco, when first ordered. If I had, I might have shared the series with my father too, as I did Pratchett’s Discworld books. He would have loved Falco as much as Captain Vimes.

Thing is, when I was dodging reading the Falco books, I thought they were straight-forward  'Historical Crime.' I  didn't appreciate how many sides to them there are, or on how many different levels they work. They are wonderful historical novels.

Rome itself comes to noisy, shoving, pushing, stinking, crowded, mucky life, in all its filth, din, poverty, privilege, injustice and lawlessness. And like all good fictional detectives, Falco loves his city and misses it painfully when he’s forced to be away.

Mulsum and must cake, street cafes, temple sacrifices, low-life, officialdom, boots that cause blisters and tunics with fish sauce stains and fraying braid... All the details of everyday life are casually mentioned in passing, raged about, laughed at, as if it was all just as ordinary, present and annoying as life in the 21st Century. 

 

In addition, the Falco books are a great laugh.

I wasn’t at all prepared for how funny the books are. Similar books may have their amusing moments, but the Falco books are often laugh-out-loud funny. 

 

Falco narrates his own stories and Falco is a vivid presence, with a wonderful turn of phrase.  His wife doesn’t like something he says and ‘shot me a look that would have skinned a weasel.’ The liveliness of the prose throughout makes other novels seem very flat.

 

There is not much of the cool, classical, toga-clad Roman about Falco, raised, as he was, in the rough, over-crowded, crime-pestered slums of the Aventine Hill (though he does drape himself in a rather worn and tatty, second-hand toga occasionally, under protest, when forced to look respectable, rather like a modern man changing his jeans for a suit.) Forget classical Latin epigrams. Falco’s chat has more of the stand-up comic’s one-liners about it.

 

Although set in the past and very funny, they are certainly not ‘cosy crime.’ They're full of fights, plotting and general vicious ill-will.

 

Nasty murders must be solved. Gangs of robbers create mayhem. Mafiosa types are causing misery. Rome has, at last, the first half-way decent and sane Emperor it’s had for years and what-d’ye-know, plotters are out to depose him. Falco is usually in the thick of it all, dodging, weaving, thumping and getting thumped. 

 

 "When the girl came rushing up the steps, I decided she was wearing far too many clothes.

"It was late summer. Rome frizzled like a pancake on a griddleplate… People flopped on stools in shadowed doorways, bare knees apart, naked to the waist— and in the backstreets of the Aventine Sector where I lived, that was just the women.

"I was standing in the Forum. She was running. She looked overdressed and dangerously hot, but sunstroke or suffocation had not yet finished her off… when she hurtled up the steps of the Temple of Saturn straight towards me, I made no attempt to move aside. She missed me, just. Some men are born lucky: others are called Didius Falco"

The Silver Pigs, Lindsey Davis

The opening paragraphs of the first book, The Silver Pigs. The girl is being chased by ‘two ugly lumps of jail-fodder, jelly-brained and broad as they were high…’ Of course, Falco, our hero, promptly deals with the ugly lumps and rescues the girl, because he isn’t just handsome, witty and charming with a shaggy mop of black curls falling over melting dark eyes. Oh no. He’s also an ex-legionary and hard-as-nails street-fighter, packing an illegal dagger hidden in his boot. (It was illegal for civilians to carry weapons on the streets of Rome.)

 The books are very tongue in cheek.

Raymond Chandler famously wrote: 

“…down these mean streets a man must go who is not himself mean, who is neither tarnished nor afraid. He is the hero… He must be a complete man and a common man and yet an unusual man. He must be…a man of honour—by instinct, by inevitability, without thought of it, and certainly without saying it. He must be the best man in his world and a good enough man for any world.

 “He will take no man’s money dishonestly and no man’s insolence without a due and dispassionate revenge. He is a lonely man and his pride is that you will treat him as a proud man or be very sorry you ever saw him…”

Since Lindsey Davis consciously took the ‘classic’ 1930s detective stories as a starting point for her Falco novels, I’m sure it’s no accident that this could almost be a character sketch of Falco.— If you add a good few laughs.

Almost. Falco is honourable and honest and certainly proud (although he’d make a joke about it.) He isn’t mean, but he is a bit tarnished and often— for good reason— afraid. (The number of beatings he takes, it’s a wonder he makes it through five books, let alone twenty. And even more of a wonder that he preserves his ‘Etruscan’ nose and good looks.)

But ‘a lonely man’? This has to be one of Davis’ in-jokes. The classic 1930s ‘tec is lonely. He has no wife and changes his women more often than his underwear. He is a childless bachelor, seemingly without any close friends or relatives. All the better to be free when Trouble comes calling. Off he wanders, down those mean streets, all on his lonely lonesome, seeking out crime to fight and wrongs to right.

But Marcus Didius Falco is Italian. A Roman. He’d probably love to be ‘a lonely man’ (at least once in a while, for a rest) but he doesn’t stand a chance.

When we first meet Falco, in The Silver Pigs, he does live alone, as every proper seedy Private Eye should. His home is a tiny two-room apartment on the sixth floor of one of those flimsy Roman tenements that were always on the point of falling down. (And frequently did. And in one of the Falco books, does.) A typical, grimy, gritty, cheap dive.

Alone — except that Falco’s fierce old mother is always coming round to tidy up, collect his washing, leave him some home-cooking, chase off any floozies Falco has mislaid and then give him Hades about either them or something else. Falco lives in fear of her. Well, if not fear, then certainly keen apprehension. Phillip Marlowe never had to put up with this.

Falco also has five sisters, and quarrels with most of them, most of the time, except his favourite, the youngest and closest to him in age. He even quarrels with her sometimes. Nor is she ever slow to tell him exactly what she thinks of him and his doings.

These five sisters have lumbered him with five brothers-in-law, all of whom he hates and considers dead-beats. Together with his sisters, they’ve produced an ever-growing number of nephews and nieces for Falco to feel responsible for, because their fathers are so useless.

Oh, and Falco has a father of his own, Geminus, an auctioneer, who ran away with a red-head when Falco was seven, leaving Falco’s mother to bring up her children alone. People are always telling Falco (to his great annoyance) that he is just like his father, in looks and character, but Falco has never forgiven Geminus for his desertion and they have a difficult relationship. If ever they seem on the point of becoming friends, Falco manages to find some reason to fall out again. — But the reader can see, between the lines, that whatever Geminus’ reason for leaving his family, he is proud of his son and quite eager to help him out and rebuild their relationship. Nevertheless, Falco hates having to accept anything from him.

Also unlike the classic ‘30s PE, Falco has friends as well as family. Among them is the old harridan who runs the laundry on the ground floor of his tottering tenement and regularly screams friendly abuse at him. There’s Thalia, the scary animal-trainer and snake-dancer (and her even scarier snake); and there’s his best friend, Petronius Longus, a watch captain of the Vigils (something between a fire-fighting squad and a police force).

Falco and Petronius served together in Britain at the time of the Boudiccan rebellion (and both heartily detest the gods-forsaken, cold, wet place.) The experience left them disillusioned with the glory that is Rome, but strongly bonded as friends. ‘Petro’ often seems to fill the place of Falco’s dead older brother, looking out for him and admonishing him in an almost fatherly way. — Davis’ characters are never simple, though. Petro is a loyal friend, a level-headed and responsible Watch Captain, a doting father, and also a terrible philanderer, always chasing some new mistress and expecting his wife to tolerate it.   

As well as Falco’s one-liners, the books are full of sly, subtextual jokes you could easily miss if you aren’t expecting them.

I think I did miss a lot because it took me a while to grasp that I wasn’t reading a simple, straight-forward ‘whodunnit?’ I suspect that many jokes flew straight past me. Still, maybe I’ll catch them on re-reading.

Not wanting to spoil others’ fun, I’ll mention just one. In ‘Last Act in Palmyra’ Falco joins a travelling actors’ troupe. Short of cash, Falco unwillingly takes on the hack-job of patching together bits of old plays to come up with something that the company can present as new at their next stop. It’s a frustrating task, and since Falco is an amateur (and unappreciated) poet, he soon concludes that he could write a new play which would be just as good as, if not better than anything in the repertoire. 

So he writes a comedy called ‘The Spook Who Spoke’ about a young man who meets the ghost of his father…

It seems there really was a Roman forerunner of ‘Hamlet.’ And Falco wrote it.

Throughout this book situations keep arising which are oddly reminiscent of events in various Shakespearian plays. I daresay I’d have spotted more if I knew more Shakespeare.

In the other books, hidden beneath the story-line, there are many other jokes, and all the tropes of the classic detective story are played with gleefully.

The twenty books are one long, developing love story.


 

In the first book, the Emperor Vespasian sends Falco on a mission  to Britain. On reporting to Britain’s Governor, Falco meets another visitor: Helena Justina Camillus, the Governor’s niece and a senator’s daughter to boot.

Naturally, he and Helena hate each other on sight. He, being a mere plebeian, is beneath her in every way, and she is right out of his league: too beautiful, too rich, too high-caste. She proves to be intelligent and well-read too, with a sharp wit and a cutting tongue. A tart, snobbish piece, he thinks.

Naturally, after other adventures and pummellings (and nearly dying), Falco ends up being hired as her bodyguard for the long, hazardous journey back to Rome. And, naturally, they end up in bed and begin a passionate, loving but sometimes fraught partnership that runs through every one of the following nineteen books.

I don’t feel guilty about that Spoiler, because anybody who’s read a few novels would see this coming a long way off. I mean, what a cliché. The ‘meet-cute,’ the love-affair that begins with dislike and misunderstanding on both sides and ends on the heights of dizzy romance and happy (almost) ever after. Predictable, or what.

But it doesn’t matter at all. What makes these books so good and compulsively readable is the sparkle of the prose and the sheer power and conviction of the characterisation.

Did somebody commit a murder? Who cares? The murder is just a maguffin, allowing Falco to have hairy adventures, and allowing us to hang out with him and Helena, and have Petro drop by with an amphora… An excuse for us to overhear another squabble with Falco’s sisters or his father, or brother-in-law, or Helena’s brothers. (One Camillus brother likes Falco and is pleased to see his sister happy with a man who is devoted to her. The other is appalled by her scandalously living with such low-caste rough trade because it might damage his own future in the Senate.)

Practically everyone who so much as crosses a page is strongly characterised, with a vivid impression of what they look like, how they speak and do their hair, what colour their tunic is, what they smell like... The stray dog, Nux, who acquires Falco despite all the resistance Falco can muster, is as lively a character as any of them. The reader feels that Lindsey Davis has spent many hours observing the behaviour of mad, hairy little dogs. Even a feral cat (Stringy) which hangs about a street food stall for all of two pages is sharply drawn.

And although Lindsey Davis has said she prefers dogs to children, Falco’s small daughters (when they arrive) are wonderfully vivid portraits of children, from the games they play, to the way they crane around the bedroom door to peer at Falco when he’s catching up on sleep after one of his adventures. Having made sure that it is him, safely home again, they run off, laughing. His hordes of nephews and nieces are, likewise, individual, robust personalities, whether five years old, or twelve, or fifteen. They are so recognisable, you feel that you’ve met them.

Helena Justina is every bit as vivid and many-sided a character as Falco. As a senator’s daughter, she’s educated and loves reading, so she’s always happy — indeed, eager — to help Falco with research in libraries and archives. There’s a standing joke about her always being curled up on every cushion in the house, with her nose stuck in a scroll. (A joke made about her author, I wonder?) 

Helena’s high social standing gives her entrance to many grand homes where the slaves would drive Falco off with sticks, and she can gossip with and ask questions of, people he would never get near. Even when making inquiries among the lower orders, she can use her status and classy charm to wheedle information from aspiring snobs who would tell him where he could go.

It's unusual, of course, for a senator’s daughter to hob-nob with a plebeian, but when Helena met Falco, she had already tried conventional marriage within her own class. Her husband proved to have no interest in her whatsoever beyond her money. So, bored, lonely and miserable, she divorced him— which I was surprised to learn Roman women could do. But I’ve learned an awful lot about the Roman Empire from the Falco books. In fact, I’m now quite interested in Roman history. More than I ever was before.

 

After her divorce, Helena decides that perhaps there’s more to life than obeying convention, and, on finding a handsome bit of rough who adores her, she allows him some very hands-on adoring. Her high-ranking family just have to put up with it. Some of them find this easier than others.

 

Falco’s first impression was correct: Helena is very intelligent, well-read and often scathingly sharp and outspoken. But he learns that she’s also compassionate and loving, fair-minded and quick to stand up both for herself and others.

 

She is also quite jealous. Knowing that Falco’s eye is always drawn to a beautiful woman (and that women’s eyes are often drawn to him), she frequently insists on accompanying him on his investigations, so she can both size up the opposition and fend it off. Or even sneaks off by herself to meet with and interview female suspects.

Helena is, convincingly and enjoyably, Falco’s other half. 

 

As for Falco, I think he is the most masculine detective created by a woman that I’ve ever come across. Possibly this is because he isn’t simply a cartoon ‘hard man’ — in fact, in many ways he’s anything but ‘hard’. He’s warm, affectionate, protective and funny. (The acknowledgements in one book thank Richard for ‘keeping things masculine.’ Richard did a good job.)

Other fictional male detectives may take cocaine and play the violin to help them solve crimes, or cudgel the little grey cells while they drink tea, or droop and muse in an aristocratic manner. Falco prefers to do his deepest thinking with his hand down the front of Helena’s dress.

Falco thinks about a lot of things besides sex— food, poetry, wine, his sore feet, his mother, his sisters, money or lack of it— but his thoughts do turn to sex a lot. However, his readers know what Helena Justina cannot know— that he is utterly besotted by her and always afraid that she will leave him. (Everyone he knows is always telling him that she will.) 

When she’s angry and berates him, he’s thrilled because if she didn’t care about him, she wouldn’t be angry. When she makes fun of him, he’s thrilled, because that means she notices what he does. When she’s jealous, he's thrilled, because it means she sees him as her property and he’s very happy to be that. He loves to see her disconcert other people, who expect her to be silent and self-effacing, as a well brought up, modest, quiet Roman matron should be. He’s as proud of her as she is of him.  

So, let’s see, that’s an adventure story, set against a brilliantly recreated Roman background, with lots of action, crackling prose, brilliant dialogue, superb characterisation, lots of laughs...

Plus lots of hidden jokes, and, even in the midst of the adventure, send-ups of all the detective story tropes...

 — oh, and a murder to solve thrown in.

The Falco books are, like the Cadfael series, excellent ‘historical detective stories’ — but they're an awful lot more at the same time.

Instead of each story being a self-contained puzzle, there’s a strong, continuing story-line from book to book, with Falco and Helena becoming older, having children, prospering a little... It’s a good idea to read the books in sequence, so you can follow the progress of a substantial cast of characters.

In between reading Falco books, I happened to read a couple of other detective novels, both from highly praised, best-selling authors, whose books have been turned into television series. I won’t name the writers or series here because, I’m afraid, compared to Falco, I thought them dead ducks. The books turned entirely around their less than fascinating ‘murder mystery’ while characterisation seemed perfunctory. They seemed written by numbers. I turned back to Falco with delight and relief.

 

Falco and Helena— I think I’m in love with both of them. Certainly, it’s been a long time since I’ve read a series of books that I’ve enjoyed so much. The story-telling and the prose crackles. The dialogue is about as good as dialogue gets. The characters kick their legs over the edge of the page, jump out of the book, stick the kettle on and hunt through your cupboards for biscuits.

Thank you, Karen.

 “Read the Falco books.”


 

 

 

 

 

 

Friday, 14 February 2025

A Broch Blog by Susan Price

 

The broch of Mousa: by kind permission of David Simpson.

Mousa is a small island off the coast of mainland Shetland with a Norse name. The 'a' at the end, as in many British place-names, means 'island.' 'Mous' means 'mossy.'

The 'Mousa boat' ferries you across to the moss. It's a nature reserve now, and well worth visiting for the birds and seals alone. But what I wanted to see -- what I'd wanted to see for years -- was the Broch of Mousa. It did not disappoint.

The first glimpse of the broch is a striking: a monumental tower, against sky and sea, its walls gently curving like those of a modern cooling tower.

Amazement only grows from there.

Towers in the North by Armit

To consider place-names again, the word ‘broch’ is the same as the ‘borough’ or ‘bury’. It means ‘fortified place’ or ‘castle.’ Archaeologists adopted the Scottish form ‘broch’ as a name for the ‘towers in the north,’ the dry-stone, ancient towers found all over Scotland and only in Scotland.

It’s impossible to accurately date these mysterious towers though it’s broadly agreed that they are ‘Iron Age’ and the oldest may be as much as three thousand years old— but Maeshowe, in Orkney, shows that there was a strong tradition of building dry-stone corbelled structures, going back five thousand years. (A corbelled roof is where dry-stone slabs are skilfully overlapped to form a smooth, inward curving roof sealed with a single cap-stone.)

 

The interior of Maeshowe, Orkney: Islandhopper, wikimedia 

Above, the interior of the passage-grave, Maeshowe, on Orkney, showing its smooth, inward curving, corbelled ceiling. It is acknowledged as 'the finest Neolithic building surviving in north-west Europe.' The main building is estimated to be at least 5000 years old, making it older than the pyramids. Its entrance is aligned to the setting sun at the midwinter solstice.

The immense, upright stone slabs at the corners have no constructive purpose at all. They are not holding up the roof or supporting the walls as you might think. They were already in place before Maeshowe was built. The grave was built around them, as if to preserve or honour them. Possibly they were standing stones. Perhaps the remains of another house or grave. I don't know about you, but this makes my brain boggle.

Mousa’s broch is the most complete of all brochs, still standing 13m (42/43 feet) high. Its twin, the broch of Burraland, which stood on the other side of the strait between Mousa and mainland Shetland, was ‘robbed out’ for building stone and is now only 2-5 metres (8 feet) high. It's sometimes suggested that Mousa's broch was protected from destruction by its position on a small island -- even though Mousa was home to stone-hungry crofters until the 19th century.

Mousa’s excellent preservation tempts us to take it as a model for all brochs but archaeology shows that Mousa is very untypical. It’s quite small, underwent considerable alteration in antiquity and, overall, is much better built than your average broch. Its superior construction may have been its salvation: it was simply harder to dismantle than other brochs. Whatever preserved it, there’s no doubt it deserves its status as a World Heritage Site.

To give a simple account of the broch’s interior:

 

Inside the broch of Mousa: copyright: David Simpson.

There are no windows in the outer wall and only one entrance, facing the sea. This entrance is 1-5 metres (5 ft) high and the passage behind it is 5 metres (16ft) long. At the end of the passage a ‘bar-hole’ can be seen in the wall. This is where a solid wooden 'bar' would have been put in place, to prevent the door being opened from outside. Whoever lived -- or took shelter -- within these massive walls was keen on some other people staying outside.

The entrance passage opens into a roughly circular space. At its centre is a hearth and a stone water-tank, reminiscent of the five thousand year old neolithic houses at Orkney’s Skara Brae. 

Although the outer circumference of Mousa Broch is 15m (45ft), the interior is only 6m (19-20ft) in diameter. Built into the massive base of the broch are three large corbelled cells, differing slightly in size. The largest is about 1-5 metres (5ft) wide, 4 meters (13ft) long and 3 metres (11 ft) high. The doors into these cells are raised above the floor of the broch, perhaps to keep out draughts. Each also has a built-in shelf— again, like Skara Brae, where the bed-spaces had shelves built into the walls beside them.

The walls above the cell-doors have gaps or windows constructed into them, possibly to lighten the load each lintel has to bear and to allow light into the cells.

Modern houses can have rooms smaller than these without the storage.

Mousa's tower is double-skinned, with a ring of outer wall, a ring of inner wall and a gap between them. The outer and inner walls are pinned together with slabs of slate. In this way ‘galleries’ were formed between the walls. It's possible, with some stooping and squeezing, to walk along these galleries to their blind ends. At other brochs, at least where enough of these galleries remain to judge, it isn't. They are too low and too much stone protrudes into them.

These galleries are due to Mousa broch's method of construction: the twin walls were built up to a certain height, then slates were used to bridge the gap between them; and then the walls were built higher and 'pinned' again. The galleries weren't intended to be lived in, or to be used as storage -- but all the same, I'd guess that they were so used, at least to some extent.


The broch's builders used the gap between the walls and the pinning slabs to make an interior stair which winds inside the walls right to the top of the tower. (The hand-rail is modern.)


Mousa's stairs: Wikimedia: Nicholas Mutton 

 Beyond this, much is conjecture.

Wikimedia
For instance, the inner wall was constructed with tall rows of gaps, (giving ancient Mousa a startlingly modern ‘architectural’ look.) It’s often argued that these were to ‘light the stairwell’ and the corbelled cells, which they certainly do today because now the tower is roofless. Perhaps it was roofed somehow, in the past, and the purpose of the 'gaps' was to reduce weight on the walls?

 

 

Roofed or Open?

 There are endless arguments about what the summit of the broch was originally like. The top was somewhat reconstructed -- with guesswork -- in the 1960s and '80s, so that now you can walk around on top, admiring the view. But no one knows for certain what the top of the broch was like when first built.

Some argue that there was no walkway and that the broch was always open to the weather, as now, allowing the rain and snow to fall down between the concentric walls.

Another argument insists that the broch was roofed somehow, though no one can quite figure out how. Maybe the gap between the walls was turfed or thatched, leaving the courtyard open... Maybe the whole top of the broch was covered by a conical thatch, making the broch look like a very tall Iron Age roundhouse.

 

Photo: wikimedia 

 Stretch!

 The Open-to-the-Sky mob reply that the weight of the supporting timbers, plus thatch, pressing outward against the walls would make this unlikely. Also, it would make the broch's interior impenetrably dark. (True, but many houses in the past were windowless and dark. Viking longhouses, for instance. Inhabitants spent much of the day outside and, at night, there was fire and lamplight.)

It's a conundrum. About the roof, I'm neutral but think there must have been some kind of platform up the top there. Why go to the enormous effort of building a dry-stone tower that may, originally,
have been more than fifteen metres high (49 ft) , with a stair climbing all the way to the top, if not to stand up there and see further than from ground level?

More Conjecture

At some point in antiquity, a stone wheelhouse was built inside the stone tower. The hearthstone and water tank belong to this wheelhouse, as does the wide stone ‘bench’ that runs around the inside of the tower. (You can see the 'bench' or wall in the photo of the interior above, running around the wall towards the left,)

The builders of the stone wheelhouse continued to use the broch's corbelled cells, because they left gaps in their own stone wall, to allow them entrance. But they built across the entrance to the broch's stairs and galleries, blocking them off. Obviously, they had no love of a sea-view or a need to know who was approaching.

It was possibly around the time this inner wheelhouse was built that the broch’s entrance was altered, making it much larger. This also meant breaking through the floor of a corbelled cell built above the entrance. (This cell must originally have been entered via the stairs and some kind of upper floor. There are also endless arguments about how this upper floor may have been built into the broch.)

 

Dun Carloway, Lewis: by permission of David Simpson
By making Mousa's entrance larger, it was also made less defensive
than the entrances of other brochs, such as Dun Carloway on Lewis, where the doorway is much smaller and narrower.

Why were the brochs built? The theory favoured in the 19th Century was that they were defensive ‘castles.’ Hence their name: 'broch, a fortified place.' Then, in the 'Peace and Love' of the 1960s and 70s, it became fashionable to say that they weren’t defensive because they couldn’t have withstood a determined attack. No, they were merely the prestigious houses of a ruling elite.

Brochs have tall, thick walls, entirely windowless on the outside. Most brochs, unlike Mousa, have low narrow doors, that make you stoop double to enter. Yet the builders could make corbelled ‘cells’ 3 metres high, so the entrances weren’t low for ease of building. They could construct windows too, so the outer walls were deliberately made without openings.

Behind the entrance, brochs have long, low, easily defended passages with doors which could be strongly barred. None of this speaks to me of an elite’s comfort. It positively screams ‘defensive’.

If a broch couldn’t have withstood a determined attack, neither could the later pele towers of the Borders but no one doubts they were defensive. Rather than withstand ‘determined attack' the peles were meant to discourage attack from largely opportunistic bands of reivers. They said: 'We're ready for you and you won't have it easy.'

The reivers were some three thousand years later but human nature stays much the same. Why invest so much time and effort into building a broch unless there’s somebody around who scares you? People capable of building a broch could, if they'd wished, have built something equally impressive and much more comfortable.

Who were the scary people? Unruly neighbours or passing armies, as with the reivers? Other commentators favour the idea that it was the Romans— but some brochs were probably built long before any possible appearance of any Roman ships off the Scottish coast.

Again, the truth is, no one knows -- which leads to many more fun arguments? Castles? Manor-houses? Cathedrals?

Many brochs seem to have had clusters of much smaller wheelhouses around them -- there are faint traces at Mousa. This might support the manor-house theory or make the broch a place of refuge during raids. Did they, like the peles, have a signalling beacon on top? Or were they look-out towers, watching for danger approaching from land or sea?

The majority of brochs are near the sea. Mousa, and the Burraland broch had views up and down the Shetland coast. Dun Carloway stands near a natural harbour on Lewis. During the time they were built, we know there was trade between Ireland and the islands -- and with what was then not yet England.

A natural harbour often becomes a market-place. Prosperous markets attract thieves and ‘trade’ easily turns into ‘raid’ and slave-taking. If a market town wants to keep its trade, it has to provide protection. Were the brochs garrisons and look-out towers, protecting a market?

In reality, the brochs may have had several purposes: defensive, if need be, but also providing advance warning of the approach of ships, for good or ill. They discouraged attacks by loudly declaring in stone: ‘We’re ready for you.’

All of which may be nonsense. Perhaps they were very expensive and uncomfortable prestige homes for the Iron Age plutocrat. What is without question is that they are astonishing feats of ancient ingenuity and engineering. Anyone who thinks the pre-Roman inhabitants of these islands were 'unsophisticated' should visit the Broch of Mousa.

And Maeshowe.

And Skara Brae.


Follow this link for a short video tour of Mousa Broch.

And if you're interested in more discussion about how, or if, the broch was roofed and what exactly it was used for, follow this link

 Susan Price's website

Friday, 4 August 2023

The Walled Orchard by Tom Holt -- A Review by Susan Price

The only real regret I have about growing so old is the fact that I shan't live long enough to read the scathing dismemberment of the clowns who presently infest our public life by a historian who has access to all the evidence and can expose every lie, reveal the source of every pay-off and back-hander, can trace the cause and effect of every stupid blunder. But then, if I could last long enough to read the book, the rage induced by it would certainly finish me off.

I've been taking refuge in historical novels. I enjoy them. I enjoy trying to imagine myself in a world different to mine in almost every way, and understanding that world from a different mind-set.

Tom Holt is best known for writing comic fantasies -- a Rhine Maiden twisting modern men around her little finger, a modern international company being managed by a dwarf from the Nibelungenlied. If you want to read a darkly comic satire on office politics and how they're merely a pale reflection of the true power struggle between immortal gods and nymphs, Tom Holt is your man.
 
After enjoying several of his fantasies, I came across his The Walled Orchard, which is very different. It's set in the Athens of Socrates (who has a minor walk-on part) and is an exceptionally good historical novel. On first reading it, many years ago, and reading it again recently, I was surprised that Holt isn't far better known as a historical novelist.

The thing that struck me about The Walled Orchard both times I've read it,  is that there's no gasp about it.  I think most historicals have a gasp: -- either a gasp of horror and thankfulness that things were so horrible then and aren't any longer, or else a gasp of longing for a lost age of more Grace, Grandeur, Freedom or whatever the author imagines the past had and the present doesn't.

But the narrative of The Walled Orchard does not gasp. I can't think of another historical novel that so completely envelops you in its time.  It finds ancient Athens completely ordinary and rather grubby, every day, annoying and disappointing. Just like today, in fact. The book cares nothing for the future or its judgement.  It's funny, scathing, angry -- reading it is like listening to some honest, forthright and witty person raging about the
bunch of numpties that have somehow inveigled themselves into power in our day. In fact, think Frankie Boyle in chiton and sandals.

The narrator of The Walled Orchard is Eupolis, a gentleman farmer whose vocation is writing comedies for the festival of Dionysus -- he hasn't much time for tragedies, finding them tiresome in the extreme, but he does know Euripedes a bit and is willing to gossip about him. (He also knows Aristophanes, his rival in the comedy stakes. He hates him.)

Eupolis' stock in trade is making fun of Athens' famous democracy and its famously democratic politicians and much of the book is a great rant about the stupidity and greed of the politicians and the (possibly) even greater stupidity and greed of the citizens -- not the slaves or the poor or the women, of course. They don't have votes and don't count in this fine democracy. (And Eupolis is fine with that.)

Eupolis admits to his own stupidity -- it led to him becoming embroiled in Athens' stupid, greedy attempt to conquer Sicily, which ended badly. The Athenian citizen chosen to be the army's general is ill and has no military experience whatsoever, while the Athenian navy and army are complacent and over-confident, certain that beating the Syracusans will 'be easy'. Oh, so easy.

Eupolis gives us an account of the Syracusan war, of a battle fought by night, where the Athenian army gets lost (several times) and then attacks itself and its allies (several times) because it can't tell who is who in the dark. It's both funny and appalling.

You can't help but be reminded of another bunch of incompetent, complacent boneheads, much nearer us in time and space, who are clattering around in the dark, attacking the wrong people and blaming everyone except themselves. Holt wrote the book 22 years ago but it's suddenly taken on a very contemporary ring.

Eupolis manages to get himself back to Athens, arriving before the news of the Athenian army's extermination. On learning about the defeat, and about the men and ships that have been lost, the city reels in shock -- and then looks round for a scapegoat. Its gaze falls on Eupolis.

There's much more to the book. The small details of everyday life in Athens are thick on every page but placed so deftly that you don't notice the skill with which they're introduced -- until you catch yourself believing that you're reading the memoirs of a man who lived that life, in that city and actually saw and did all these things.

Among all the down-to-earth, everyday gossip about what Euripides was really like, and how to improve your soil and increase your olive yield, and how to farm between Spartan invasions, there are a couple of supernatural episodes, which are unexpected and chilling.

Eupolis tells us how, as a boy, he nearly died in the plague outbreak that did kill his immediate family. He wakes, weak and dazed, in his deserted street and meets Dionysus, with whom he has a chat (recognising Him by His theatrical mask and prop leather phallus.) The God tells him that He kept Eupolis alive because He has a purpose for him. We'll meet again, says the God, and tells Eupolis where -- and they do meet there, in a thrown-away moment, all the more chilling for its sudden matter-of-factness. At this second meeting, Dionysus also informs him of a third and final meeting, which Eupolis is still awaiting in the book's closing pages.

After the plague leaves almost all his family dead, the young Eupolis finds himself rich from inheritances, in possession of enough land to join the city's upper classes. He not unnaturally concludes that Dionysus wants him to become a comic poet in His honour -- and he sets about serving the God by mocking and lambasting the city, its people and its politicians.

He hates Athens, he hates her stupid populace, he hates Tragedies and all other comic poets; he hates democracy and he hates his wife -- and he loves all of them, can't leave them, can't give them up.


Eupolis mentions that the plague has left him bald and with a twisted face -- he has a permanent, involuntary grin. His wife, Phaedra, a fearsome and unfaithful termagant, is beautiful when he first marries her but is later involved in a cart accident, where she is kicked in the face by a mule. Her broken jaw, badly set, leaves her with a permanent grin. So not only are they like an Athenian Punch and Judy, a knockabout stage comedy couple but they both grin like a couple of Comedy masks. Both of them mask their own natures too -- and perhaps Athens' theatre of noble tragedies and tragic heroes is a mask that hides the city's true spirit, which might be thought closer to the phalluses, scatology, abuse and violence of the comedies. 


Comedy is always about real life, baseness and failure, while Tragedy is about the sublime: impossible Gods and heroes. Eupolis lives and ends his life as a comic hero -- a failure as a husband and a father, a playwright who knows his plays will be forgotten and who didn't even mean as much to His God as he thought he did. He advises us to heed the one thing he's learned in life which is: While travelling, go and have something to eat immediately and leave the sight-seeing until later. Then at least you've had a good meal.

The Walled Orchard certainly isn't a failure. It's impressive and it achieves this difficult thing: it makes you see ancient Athens as clearly and realistically as it's perhaps possible for us to see it: as completely ordinary and a bit squalid. No gasp at all. 

Tom Holt's other novels set in ancient Greece are also well worth a read:

 


can be found here.