Ever
since opening Karen Cushmans’ Catherine Called Birdy novel
back in 1996, I have remembered the freshness, energy and rebellious
joy of that first page. Her determined character has been stuck in my
mind:
12th
Day of September. I
am commanded to write an account of my days: I am bit by fleas and
plagued by family. That is all there is to say.
13th
Day of September. My
father must suffer from ale head this day, for he has cracked me
twice before dinner instead of once. I hope his angry liver bursts.
14th
Day of September. Tangled
my spinning again. Corpus bones, what a torture.
15th
Day of September. Today
the sun shone and the villagers sowed hay, gathered apples and pulled
fish from the stream. I trapped inside, spent two hours embroidering
a cloth for the church and three hours picking out the stitches after
my mother saw it. I wish I were a villager.
And so on.
The diary begins in September 1290 but it does not focus on the
intrigues of royal courts or
famous historical figures, Instead, it gives us the thoughts of the writer: fourteen-year-old Catherine,
nicknamed Birdy because of the number of pet birds she keeps in her
chamber.
Birdy
is the only daughter of Lord Rollo and Lady Aislinn, who live
in a small manor house in Lincolnshire. She comments, with humour,
puzzlement and rage upon her
family, her friends, her
everyday life and the annoying
fact that her father intends to marry her to the wealthiest
bidder.
Birdy
does not want to be a lady, nor married. She prefers spending time
with Perkin the goat-herd and her “heart’s brother”, and her
other young friends in the village. She hates the needlework,
restrictions and all the boring “lady-lessons” she is given by her nurse
Morwenna, her mother and by various tutors.
However, her sympathetic brother Edward, a young monk in the scriptorium at
the nearby abbey, has convinced their mother that Birdy should learn
to read and write, even if she has to give up some of her needlework
time. Reflecting on her daily life, he suggests, will help Birdy
improve her character - and so the diary has begun.
Gradually,
between one September and the next, Birdy’s diary shows her
learning about the uses of herbs and the making of manuscripts, as
well as experiencing love, jealousy and heart-break. She discovers
the true story of where babies come from and drives away several
suitors by tricks and bad behaviour. She sees the effects of sorrow,
poverty and death and senses what her future role might be – even
if early entries are laced with jokes about jakes, farts and
bums, amounts of silly pranks and
a quantity of curious
information on odd saints. Catherine Called Birdy is an
exuberant joy of a book with a character that was wonderfully
“feisty” before publishers had even heard of the now overused
word.
My
copy of the novel had been sitting quietly on its shelf for over two
decades when suddenly I heard that title again: Catherine Called
Birdy has now been released as a full length film which, after a
short cinema run, is streaming on Prime.
Written and directed by
Lena Denham and starring Bella Ramsay as
Birdy, the film a glorious medieval coming-of-age romp. Though there
are moments of seriousness, the story is not solemnly told. I was
reminded of “Will”, the film about young Shakespeare from
the Horrible Histories team, and felt that Birdy might create
a similar interest in that period of history for a young teen
audience, in addition to much older persons.
Birdy,
the film, starts with impact: before the opening credits, our heroine
appears splattered in mud at a wild wattle-and-daub village
cottage-raising, an incident shifted some way from its place in the original plot.
In general, the film creates a picture of a close-knit medieval
community, its seasonal festivities and the hard realities of life.
This manor is a place where candles gutter, food runs scarce or goes
rotten, where the privy is a public necessity, where parents expect
to beat their children and Birdy’s bed is shared by her nurse
Morwenna and any visiting females.
Although
the film avoids the public hanging of the original book, Denham does
focus on menstruation as the important indication of marriageability.
Birdy’s first monthly flow is shown as a turning point in her life.
Innocently fearing she might be dying, she is horrified by the kindly
Morwenna’s practical explanation and determines to conceal her
womanhood from her father. For a while Birdy’s ruse works but
eventually, she is discovered.
After she amusingly dissuades many
suitors, Lord Rollo becomes determined and accepts the offer of a man she calls Shaggy Beard, a rich much older suitor from
Yorkshire, who gives Birdy a purse of silver coins, By accepting the
money, she is accepting her eventual marriage, although it is agreed that Birdy
can stay with her mother until the newr baby is born. In the book,
Birdy gives the money to Meg from the dairy so she and her husband
can swain pay the death tax and live, with Perkins in his
grandmothers cottage. In the film, the money is used in another way
and has a different impact.
The
film reshapes and slightly restructures the book, using modern
multiracial casting, a modern soundtrack as well as making the ending larger
and more emotional. Birdy’s father is given a stronger role and the
ending is slightly adjusted (no doubt as a reflection of the star
status of the actors Andrew Scott and Billie Piper) to allow for a
couple of bigger scenes, which give Birdy a true insight into the
complexity of adult life and relationships.
Although
I enjoyed the film very much, and loved its energy, and sense of life and
laughter, certain moments felt much more "unhistorical"
than others. Though not enough to overpower the pleasure or fun, I
had problems with film-Birdy’s attitude to religion, to books and
to writing.
In
the original, Birdy has a valued book of saints, a precious item
that belongs to her mother, whose family was once wealthy. Her diary
entries open with a reference to the saint of that day. For example,
randomly I found:
27th
Day of November. Feast of Saint Fergus, an Irish bishop, who
condemned irregular marriages, sorcerers and priests who wear their
hair long and
17th
Day of December. Feast of Saint Lazarus who was raised by Jesus and
afterwards went to France.
These
headings were both based on facts I found elsewhere so I am assuming that
many of Cushman's references might be accurate too. They are important as indicators of the strongly religious culture and mindset of
the age. In the novel, although Birdy does not reveal a great devotion to the
saints or religion, she does experience it as an everyday part of
her life.
Yet
the film, however, pushes this attitude almost too far. When Birdy
goes on an errand, in her mother’s place, to her brother Edward’s
monastery, she is overcome by the sight of the young monks. She
stands, eyes wide, clutching at the body of a life-size crucifix in
the middle of the cloister lawn. While this image was amusing enough
in its way, that scene felt total at odds with what I imagine
as the spiritual frame of the age. Even knowing of the wealth of
almost erotic religious literature created by certain saints, for a
moment, the gap in the “history” of the film felt too large. Was
it simply my response to the blatant modern mix of sacred and
profane? Yet the following scene, where Birdy goes to her brother’s
cell amusingly concealed beneath his cloak, did not feel seriously
confrontational at all. Is there a limit to how far modern historical
fiction can be stretched on screen?
This
leads me to my second problem: the reverence for the act of writing and
the cultural value of books. In the novel, Cushman showed Birdy absorbed in the
work of the scriptorium, deciding that she would like to be a monk.
“To
spend the rest of my life making pictures instead of mending and
weaving would be heaven indeed!”
This
book-Birdy is interested in the process, noting the monks’ desire
for lapis lazuli and other long-lasting colours and inks for their
manuscripts. In her enthusiasm, she tries to make her own.
“I
made a paste from bilberries that looks as blue as a robin’s egg
but it grows sour and so sticky that I must add a task that the
brothers have never dreamed of: picking bugs out of the heavenly sky
or the Virgin’s veil.”
The
book-Birdy would, I felt, have had a care in the way she used her
diary and did her writing, even if the results were not perfect.
However,
in the film version, Birdy’s pages are covered in careless
scrawlings, even allowing for the difficulties of a quill pen. They
look like the jottings of a modern child who believes that more
sheets of paper or another exercise book will always be available. In
my – yes, opinionated - opinion, her pages do not look like the
work of a girl who has handled vellum and observed monks working on
illuminated manuscripts or the reverence with which these
books were treated. Birdy's scrawl and sketches clashed against my
ideas of the respect for writing at that time - but am I wrong? Certainly, badly-done homework might be more meaningful to any of the young viewers than exquistite lettering and they will have time,ifthye choose, to form their own views on life in the medieval England.
Ignore my worries, because Catherine called Birdy is a treat, in either or
in both its appearances. Do search them out, for yourself or your teens if you like history mixed with humour.
Even better news: Karen Cushman, the original author is still alive. I do hope she is celebrating her
memorable Birdy’s bright new flight
Penny
Dolan
@pennydolan1