It’s hard trying to think about Christmas when you write
about war. My characters may be fiction but the war they fought is not, and it
feels rather heartless to abandon them up to their knees in trench-mud in order
to put tinsel on a Christmas tree.
|
'Sentinel of the Zouaves' by William Simpson - Crimea |
And mud, of course, is the least they had to contend with. My current novel follows the Siege of Sevastopol in the Crimean War, where our
troops spent the winter of 1854 huddled in rags in freezing trenches, without
fire, without rest or proper medical care, and often even without food. I’d
planned to blog about it here, but apart from the fact it's been done definitively in this brilliant post by our December guest Helen Rappaport, it just didn’t seem right to regale you with
horrors at the height of the festive season. It’s as if war and Christmas
simply don’t mix.
Yet actually they have a relationship we don’t
often imagine. Christmas isn’t just about celebration – it’s a time for love
and hope and thoughts of family, a time of yearning for peace. It’s a
truism to say that the ‘spirit of Christmas’ isn’t found in the tinsel, but it
can and has been found amid the horror of war.
If anything, that’s when it’s most important. It’s a beacon
of hope at the turn of the year, a time to let go of the tragedy of the past
and look forward to brighter times ahead. Midshipman Wood quotes a ‘senior
Regimental officer’ on Christmas in the Crimea:
‘Standing that day on
Green Hill… caused many reflections – sad and solemn retrospection for the
brave men who slept the sleep of death around us; joyful and glorious
perspective picturing to myself the ultimate fate of the formidable fortress... Such was Christmas Day 1854; yet to that hour the Division to which I
belong had not received an ounce of meat a man for dinner – in fact dinner we
had none.’
Only hope. The men in the WW1 trenches actually fared better
for food, but before their eyes was still this same image of hope for the
future. There’s a terrible poignancy for us in this famous army Christmas card
where the year blazing gloriously on the horizon is – 1915:
It seems such a cheap thing now, a glib printed card to
cheer the troops. Standard issue cards for the men to send home typically gave space only for a ‘To’ and ‘From’
section to be personalized. But who’s to say what they meant to the people
receiving them – a positive proof that their son, their husband or brother, was
alive and thinking of them at Christmas? And what would be our emotion if we
received something as personal and precious as this?
|
Christmas card from unidentified British soldier 1916 |
Even the little things matter. Holly, mistletoe, a Christmas
card, something ‘better than usual’ for dinner. The ‘trimmings’ can serve as a
reminder of happier days, and boost a determination
not to allow war to destroy a much-loved tradition. Soldiers foraged for
mistletoe in the fields of Flanders, and army messes for over a century have
given the ‘feast’ an air of saturnalia by having NCOs wait on the men, and
officers on the NCOs.
|
Soldiers collecting mistletoe on the Flanders front |
Even in the starving Crimea officers struggled to produce
something ‘special’ for Christmas. The young Garnet Wolseley actually attempted to make a plum pudding out of figs, biscuit, and some ‘very rancid suet or grease’.
He used a Russian round shot and a section of 13” shell as pestle
and mortar to pulverise the biscuit into flour, mixed the
whole lot into a ‘horrible looking mess’, and wrapped it in his own towel to
cook over the fire. Unfortunately he and his friend were unexpectedly called to trench duty and decided to eat the pudding half raw – with the
predictable result that by 10pm he imagined ‘I could feel, if not actually hear,
each piece I had swallowed of that infernal pudding’ and had to be helped back
to his tent bent double with pain.
Wolseley’s memoirs laugh at this recollection, but there’s
one casual line in his description that made me sit up straight. He always
makes light of the actual fighting, which at this time was pretty constant, but
on Christmas Day he records with surprise that there was ‘no firing going on
anywhere.’ None.
|
German Christmas card 1915 |
Perhaps he should have expected it, since Christmas is about the bond of humanity which
anyone can share. While the British were sending home loving Christmas cards in
WWI, so were the Germans - and the messages are all but identical. If the British
wanted a quiet Christmas and a break from killing, then it's only natural that the Germans should too.
And famously in 1914 they had one. The Christmas Truce of
1914 is no myth, but a reality testified to by countless letters from the
trenches all telling the same story. There was no official truce, no one big single
event, but all along the lines were little pockets of quiet as British and
Germans exchanged first words and then carols, then rose from the trenches to
meet each other in No Man’s Land.
|
Christmas Truce 1914 |
Here, for instance, is Rifleman Reading in a letter to his
wife in Chesham: ‘During the early part of the morning the Germans started
singing and shouting, all in good English… At 4 p.m part of their Band played
some Christmas carols and "God save the King", and "Home Sweet
Home." You could guess our feelings. Later on in the day they came towards
us, and our chaps went out to meet them... I shook hands with some of them, and they gave us cigarettes and
cigars. We did not fire that day, and everything was so quiet that it seemed
like a dream.’
|
Christmas Truce 1914 |
Here’s another, from a soldier still unidentified: ‘There
must be something in the spirit of Christmas as today we are all on top of our
trenches running about. Whereas other days we have to keep our heads well down….
Just before dinner I had the pleasure of shaking hands with several Germans: a
party of them came 1/2way over to us so several of us went out to them… After
exchanging autographs and them wishing us a Happy New Year we departed and came
back and had our dinner.... We can hardly believe that we’ve been firing at them for the
last week or two—it all seems so strange'
Strange indeed. These are wonderful stories, yet for me
there’s still a desperate sadness about them because the truces were only
temporary. Here’s Captain J C Dunn of
the Royal Welch Fusiliers describing how hostilities re-started on his section
of the front:
'At 8.30 I fired three shots in the air and put up a flag
with "Merry Christmas" on it, and I climbed on the parapet. He
[a German] put up a sheet with "Thank you" on it, and the German
Captain appeared on the parapet. We both bowed and saluted and got down
into our respective trenches, and he fired two shots in the air, and the War
was on again.'
|
'The Khaki Chums' - Cross marking the site of a Christmas Truce 1914 |
Back to war – but with everything even worse, because now they
knew the men they fired at. The Christmas Truce is a beautiful thing, but for
me it simply screams with the whole futility of war. Recognizing the bond of
humanity was something kept only for that one day of Christmas – and soon not
even then. The War Office discouraged ‘fraternization’, the officers were made
to forbid it, and while isolated incidents occurred in both 1915 and 1916, by
1917 they had disappeared completely.
|
British Christmas card 1917 |
To the Powers That Be, Christmas has no place in war except
to whip up hate against the enemy. Here’s an official British Christmas card for 1917, and if you
can see the spirit of Christmas in it that’s more than I can do.
We’re no better now. The war in Afghanistan may feature different
religions, but I can’t see anything Christian about this gleeful report in the
Daily Mail of British troops attacking the Taliban on Christmas Day and
marching back to base in Santa hats.
I don’t blame the soldiers. They do their job, and it is
politicians who dictate what that is and how it should be conducted. Yet when
everything else is burnt away, the men who fight come closer to understanding
the bond of humanity than politicians ever can. The Truce of 1914
began with ordinary soldiers, and for them it isn’t just for Christmas.
I saw this first in the Crimea. From the letters and diaries
of ordinary men I’ve learned that there were truces for the burial of the dead,
and on these occasions British and Russians talked and laughed together,
sharing wine and tobacco and stories of home. I’ve learned that ‘friendly’
contests were arranged, and that a secret artillery duel was played out between
the rival 68-pounders of a Russian and a British battery until the Russians
signalled defeat. One even more extraordinary challenge was issued, and for
several nights after the burial truce of March 1855 a Russian and a French
officer met secretly near the Inkerman ruins in order to determine which of
them was better – at chess.
Soldiers at war don’t have to lose their humanity. Some
reviewers scoffed at the scene in ‘The War Horse’ when the Germans help
the Allies free a terrified horse from the barbed wire, but to me this seems
perfectly plausible. Even in the Crimea such things happened. Midshipman Wood describes
how a drunken Frenchman reeled crazily about between the lines singing the
Marseillaise, but the Russians showed fellow-feeling and never fired. Another
time two wounded British lay groaning in the open on the edge of the Left
Attack, but the Russian sharpshooters raised a white flag to show they would
hold their fire to allow their friends to bring them in. These are events in April
and May 1855, but to me they show the spirit of Christmas.
So does this. After the Battle of Inkerman in November 1854,
Captain Clifford of the Rifle Brigade was passing wounded Russian prisoners
when ‘a man among them ran up and called out to me, and pointed to his shoulder
bound up. It was the poor fellow whose arm I had cut off yesterday. He laughed,
and said ‘Buono, Johnny!’ I took his
hand and shook it heartily, and the tears came in my eyes. I had not a shilling
in my pocket, but had I had a bag of gold he should have had it.’
|
Watercolour by Captain Clifford |
It’s only one moment of bonding in a whole war of savage
stupidity, but it reminds me of Wilfred Owen’s haunting poem ‘Strange Meeting’,
where a soldier is greeted in death by a man who tells him, ‘I am the enemy you
killed, my friend.’ It’s moving, uplifting, and utterly excoriating in what it
says about the insanity of war.
So’s Christmas. When
I first read ‘A Christmas Carol’ I was puzzled by Scrooge’s line ‘I will honour
Christmas in my heart, and try to keep it all the year’, because it seemed ridiculous
to eat turkey every day and live in a house perpetually full of tinsel. Now I understand it better, and its truth is plainest in the tragedy of war. For
just one day we should stop killing each other? For just one day we long for ‘peace
on earth and goodwill towards men’? For just one day?
I hope we can do better. I doubt any international statesmen
are reading this blog, but that won’t stop me wishing that politicians the
world over would shut up and listen not just to the angels, but to the humanity
of their own soldiers. The message doesn’t have to be confined to a particular
religion; it doesn’t have to be confined to religion at all. But once we
recognize and celebrate our shared humanity, then the spirit of Christmas will
be everywhere and always, and the horrors of the Crimea and the WWI trenches
can be left where they belong – in history.
***
7 comments:
What a marvellous, touching post! Thankyou Louise!
A truly moving and beautiful post. Thank you Louise.
Thank you Louise. It is truly heart-breaking that men could be friendly one day and killing each other the next.
Such a good and thoughtful post, Louise!
Except that Christmas for the Russians is not the same as Christmas for us. So any cease is more important if anything.
Such an excellent post, Louise! It's the "...one moment of bonding in a whole war of savage stupidity" that I look for in historical fiction. Novels allow that to be shown more easily than reality does.
What a wonderful, touching post - as always. Have a lovely Christmas, Louise xx
Post a Comment